Science isn't my long suit but spotting Biotech Mafia bait and switch with targets of public outrage is pretty solid. Paired with understanding of wild RNA vs clones lays bare the lie about the much trumpeted Barik/Dazsak unique Gain of Function threat.
What everyone in the vaccine space knows is that GoF is the process used to create and test vaccines & therapeutics for Influenza & Coronavirus strains. Even traditional egg based jabs select viral elements from their soup of CRISPR clones.. For me what folks will not say weighs as heavily as the focus and everyone who refuses to properly name these transfections or defend biology for RNA to debunk GoF threat aren't sincere.
Lots to slog through.. more fun to search "however" to count times they note petrie dish, knock out mice & ferrets may not reflect human immune response.. other fun search terms "reproducible" 'model' "unknown" "pandemic policy" "stakeholder" "immune system" lest used term in document "clone" Table of Contents alone an eye popper
2016 Gryphon Scientific 1,000+ page Gain of Function Risks & Benefits..
Hi. You might find Jay's June 28 stream with David Ransack insightful. They discuss some ideas around infectious/disease-causing viruses vs viral genetic signals: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2184162142?t=00h12m11s
They can't even prove the existence of viruses. Sequences come from a toxic soup of crap after they take a sample from someone with a disease and then they declare it's from a virus. They can't isolate said virus. They can't run repeatable experiments with said virus. It's theoretical. Because the cause of disease is not obvious to people, they get away with this fraud.
I don't know what you would be cloning if you can't isolate a virus to begin with. It's absurd.
Agree about the culturing, The entirety of RNA virology is based on using synthetic RNA/DNA clones of a sequence they purport to find in nature. Clones are proxy, and not something that would occur naturally. They can be made in high quantity, and shipped anywhere. Whether they are toxic, create illness, or simply seed a genetic signal that will satisfy all the microbiologists are the questions.
Dr. Couey, Thank you so much for writing this. It is clear and understandable. Someone who is so intelligent is one thing, but to have the ability to teach and explain what you morally know is truth, is a unique, special gift that I am so grateful for. Dr. R.
ok dumb question: how do these "virologists" know that the "sequences" they are stitching together and plotting in their phylogenetic trees are in fact what they think they are if the whole "isolation" thing is not clear? I'll have to read through all of this again, but it seems to me that it's all based on lies if they can't definitively say that "this sequence" causes "this illness".
You wrote that McKernan is making us accept "that millions of sequences have been recorded" and that "these sequences can be arranged in a phylogenic tree".
But I don't understand why it would not be possible to arrange the sequences to a phylogenic tree. If you simply have a list of SNVs that each sample has relative to Wuhan-Hu-1, then you can calculate the distance between a pair of samples by counting how many mutations exist only in one of the two samples but not in both. And you can make a distance matrix by repeating the same procedure for each pair of samples. And then you can turn the distance matrix into a phylogenic tree.
This code downloads the mutation list of about 700,000 GISAID submissions from 2020 and it makes a phylogenetic tree for a random subset of 50 sequences:
You can run the code by copying and pasting it to the R console application after installing R from here: https://cran.r-project.org. If you need more sequences then you can download a similar mutation list of over 4 million US sequences from here (along with FASTA files for the full sequences): https://vigilance.pervaers.com/i/136194099/downloadable-datasets.
3. The Covid plandemic didn’t save a penny in Medicare expenses. Instead, it blew the federal budget deficit so out of proportion that we are adding $1 trillion of new debt to the national debt every few months.
J please weigh in on this self-replicatin' "covid" jab from Japan (on yer Twitch is fine too); is it a bioweapon? Is this just FEAR? (notta stem brain at all here... wonderin' if this is just a new con / hoax or a legit way ta kill us all b/c with self-replication there's no OPT OUT option!) I think Dr. Nagase (who's makin' the warnin' call)--is on the up & up...
Science isn't my long suit but spotting Biotech Mafia bait and switch with targets of public outrage is pretty solid. Paired with understanding of wild RNA vs clones lays bare the lie about the much trumpeted Barik/Dazsak unique Gain of Function threat.
What everyone in the vaccine space knows is that GoF is the process used to create and test vaccines & therapeutics for Influenza & Coronavirus strains. Even traditional egg based jabs select viral elements from their soup of CRISPR clones.. For me what folks will not say weighs as heavily as the focus and everyone who refuses to properly name these transfections or defend biology for RNA to debunk GoF threat aren't sincere.
Lots to slog through.. more fun to search "however" to count times they note petrie dish, knock out mice & ferrets may not reflect human immune response.. other fun search terms "reproducible" 'model' "unknown" "pandemic policy" "stakeholder" "immune system" lest used term in document "clone" Table of Contents alone an eye popper
2016 Gryphon Scientific 1,000+ page Gain of Function Risks & Benefits..
https://web.archive.org/web/20161206155142/http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Risk-and-Benefit-Analysis-of-Gain-of-Function-Research-Final-Report.pdf
Thanks for sharing videos and links that support and clarify your points. You have a gift for asking the right questions.
And having right support for answers! ;)
I am absolutely lost here...what is he saying? Can we make viruses? Or only clones? And what are the implications for each?
Cannot grasp. At all. Anyone?
Hi. You might find Jay's June 28 stream with David Ransack insightful. They discuss some ideas around infectious/disease-causing viruses vs viral genetic signals: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2184162142?t=00h12m11s
They can't even prove the existence of viruses. Sequences come from a toxic soup of crap after they take a sample from someone with a disease and then they declare it's from a virus. They can't isolate said virus. They can't run repeatable experiments with said virus. It's theoretical. Because the cause of disease is not obvious to people, they get away with this fraud.
I don't know what you would be cloning if you can't isolate a virus to begin with. It's absurd.
Agree about the culturing, The entirety of RNA virology is based on using synthetic RNA/DNA clones of a sequence they purport to find in nature. Clones are proxy, and not something that would occur naturally. They can be made in high quantity, and shipped anywhere. Whether they are toxic, create illness, or simply seed a genetic signal that will satisfy all the microbiologists are the questions.
But there are patents. Ive seen them. Non replicating infectious clones. So clonesof what?
There is so much fraud in patents. There is no way to oversee all the science being claimed.
Thanks for publishing this work-in-progress it's the kind of meat I've come to expect and enjoy sinking teeth into...
Dr. Couey, Thank you so much for writing this. It is clear and understandable. Someone who is so intelligent is one thing, but to have the ability to teach and explain what you morally know is truth, is a unique, special gift that I am so grateful for. Dr. R.
J.J. Couey, you magnificent bastard.
"........I read your book! " : (George Patton speaking of Rommel)
Check out today's posting on this Substack to learn about meddlers.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/
ok dumb question: how do these "virologists" know that the "sequences" they are stitching together and plotting in their phylogenetic trees are in fact what they think they are if the whole "isolation" thing is not clear? I'll have to read through all of this again, but it seems to me that it's all based on lies if they can't definitively say that "this sequence" causes "this illness".
Thanks so much for all you do JJ
You wrote that McKernan is making us accept "that millions of sequences have been recorded" and that "these sequences can be arranged in a phylogenic tree".
But I don't understand why it would not be possible to arrange the sequences to a phylogenic tree. If you simply have a list of SNVs that each sample has relative to Wuhan-Hu-1, then you can calculate the distance between a pair of samples by counting how many mutations exist only in one of the two samples but not in both. And you can make a distance matrix by repeating the same procedure for each pair of samples. And then you can turn the distance matrix into a phylogenic tree.
This code downloads the mutation list of about 700,000 GISAID submissions from 2020 and it makes a phylogenetic tree for a random subset of 50 sequences:
> install.packages(c("ape","data.table"));library(ape)
> system("curl -Ls sars2.net/f/gisaid2020.tsv.xz|xz -dc>gisaid2020.tsv")
> t=as.data.frame(data.table::fread("gisaid2020.tsv"))
> t=t[sample(nrow(t),50),]
> mut=strsplit(t$nuc,",")
> m=t(sapply(mut,\(x)table(factor(x,unique(unlist(mut))))))
> rownames(m)=paste(t$pango,t$divergence,t$collection,t$country,t$region,t$gisaid,sep="|")
> f="1.png"
> png(f,w=900,h=1100)
> hc=as.hclust(reorder(as.dendrogram(hclust(dist(m))),prcomp(m)$x[,1]))
> plot(as.phylo(hc),cex=1.3,font=1,underscore=T)
> dev.off()
> system("mogrify -trim -bordercolor white -border 16x16 1.png")
Here's the result: https://i.ibb.co/y48WWy3/gisaid-random-50-sequences-tree.png. There's one branch for Alpha samples from December and November 2020, one branch for B.1 samples from spring 2020, and so on.
You can run the code by copying and pasting it to the R console application after installing R from here: https://cran.r-project.org. If you need more sequences then you can download a similar mutation list of over 4 million US sequences from here (along with FASTA files for the full sequences): https://vigilance.pervaers.com/i/136194099/downloadable-datasets.
.
Even Pavlov’s Dog
Would Have Figured Out This Charade
And Turned On Its Owner.
Now The Salient Question Is:
How Many Vicious Bites
Would It Take The Doctor
To Turn On Its Owner ?
.
4. The Chinese say their Covid vax is made using cultured NSARS 2. Are they lying?
3. The Covid plandemic didn’t save a penny in Medicare expenses. Instead, it blew the federal budget deficit so out of proportion that we are adding $1 trillion of new debt to the national debt every few months.
1. What about rabies? We are told that without vaccination and gammaglobulin to increase antibody levels, you will die. Is this wrong?
2. Jeff Childers of “Coffee & Covid” is pursuing a 7th Amendment lawsuit right now. Have you read it? Have you reached out to Jeff?
J please weigh in on this self-replicatin' "covid" jab from Japan (on yer Twitch is fine too); is it a bioweapon? Is this just FEAR? (notta stem brain at all here... wonderin' if this is just a new con / hoax or a legit way ta kill us all b/c with self-replication there's no OPT OUT option!) I think Dr. Nagase (who's makin' the warnin' call)--is on the up & up...
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/japans-plan-to-destroy-the-world?
What’s up with Jessica Hockett? I’m sorry I haven’t kept up?