Discover more from Gigaohm Biological
This transcript is raw and inaccurate…but maybe better than nothing until I get around to editing these.
Keep up the steady pressure.
Don’t take the bait.
Love your neighbor.
There was no spread in New York City. Infectious clones are the only real threat. And placebo batches were likely distributed, and transfection in healthy mammals is dumb. The protocols were probably murder and gain of function is definitely a mythology. The Scooby-Doo mystery is real. It's a national security theater, and it requires a spectacular commitment to lies.
00:15:00:00 - 00:15:25:18
And it is it is working exceedingly well.
00:15:25:22 - 00:15:53:24
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. This is gigaohm Biological, a high resistance, low noise information brief brought to you by biologists is January eight, 2024. My name is Jonathan Couey and I am that biologist. I realize now that I didn't update the scroll there at the top, so it's still the old one from the other day. I apologize to the actually quite maybe three or four people that recently signed up, and so I should have updated that a little bit.
00:15:53:24 - 00:16:18:37
And I do apologize tomorrow. That'll be better. Let me just place some things here and stop some things here and get over here with this thing and okay, that should be out and now we do a different one. I hope this finds everybody well, I hope you're not stressed by your life. I hope you're not stressed in your family.
00:16:18:37 - 00:16:44:31
I hope the main thing is that you can focus on trying to get this stuff out to other people. I hope that in general, your biggest problems are are are I hope your biggest problems are coaching basketball and and challenging work problems that have to do with how to get your next promotion and what to do when you're done finishing, when you're finished paying off with your mortgage.
00:16:44:31 - 00:17:05:21
I really hope that there are lots of people that watch that show and that are in that scenario where where their life is pretty stable and they're able to feel some freedom to act. And I think I understand why a lot of people can feel as though there's not they don't have any real choice. They can barely keep up with their bills.
00:17:05:26 - 00:17:28:21
They're in fact way behind on their bills. They're just able to keep up with maintaining their the illusion of keeping up with their bills. So much of our world today is based on an illusion. How many of the cars do we see on the street in Pittsburgh and around the United States are leased cars that don't belong to the person that's driving them, even though they behave as though they do?
00:17:28:26 - 00:17:56:42
And how many of those cars that we see are over leased, leveraged to sorry, overleveraged, you know, crazy over sticker price kind of things, underwater loan agreements that, you know, look real nice as they drive down the street. But in reality are a financial ruin waiting to happen. The United States and a lot of the western world is is riding on this thin ice of fractional reserve banking and debt.
00:17:56:50 - 00:18:21:35
And it can't be sustained forever. And I think that's part of their excuse for why the West needs to be controlled, demolished. So this is the safest way to get the biology that will kind of help you break through this illusion into your head. And I think it's important to see that. I don't think that this is only biological.
00:18:21:35 - 00:19:16:44
I don't think that they plan to govern us simply by a biological methodology. What I think is spectacular about this aspect of this future style of governance is that it is based around a mythology that studious, well read properly trained biologists that understand that there is a certain level of complexity that can't be distilled any more, that there is a certain level of beauty that exists inside of that irreducible complexity that really is the heart of biology, and it is the layer upon layer upon layer of pattern integrity that that forms the metabolic symphony that is the inside of a single cell, never mind the many different tissues and sub tissues that make up who
00:19:16:44 - 00:19:49:21
we are as as physical beings. And then we think about all the physiology that we don't understand. The the ionic electro acid that that is used fundamentally to orchestrate all of the metabolism and physiology of our bodies. But also in the second, by second or millisecond by millisecond, nervous system monitoring and control of our behavior. And so all of these things in my mind, make it the reason why you would want to study biology.
00:19:49:21 - 00:20:23:22
You might also want to study the chemistry and the physics that underlie it. But ultimately, that's the the sort of the universe's finest expression of the the orchestration of physics and chemistry is biology. And that's also the very tempting nature of biology. To think that you understand it when you're trying to understand from the level of biology, all the while understanding that underpinning that are an entire entire layers of understanding that you don't grasp.
00:20:23:22 - 00:20:43:16
As a biologist, I can't explain to you the, the, the fine details of the organic, all the organic chemistry that goes on at the cellular level, all the organic chemistry that goes on just for for, for hormones alone is enough for me to say, you know, to tap out and say that's not my, my thing. I could read up on it.
00:20:43:21 - 00:21:08:51
But the chemistry at that level is spectacular. The chemistry at the level of a membrane of a cell is spectacular. And I'm not an expert in any of those things. But as a biologist, I think in conceptual terms that try to ride on top of these physics and chemically okay, physics and chemistry principles, but that's the illusion of being a biologist.
00:21:08:51 - 00:21:42:11
There are many times where if our physics and chemistry isn't sufficient to properly direct our understanding in our interrogation of these biological ideas or these biological observations, then we don't properly test those hypotheses and can get down very deep into a cave of mythology where we just don't really understand where we went wrong. But somehow we got much farther away from the goal and then we wanted to, with this line of investigation in biology is especially dangerous for that.
00:21:42:16 - 00:22:31:24
And that's why I do think that there are better ways to get it in your head than than direct incision and insertion. The pandemic was created by an elaborate national security theater. And I'm not suggesting to you for one second that this national security theater on in principle and on paper was not for a good reason. In the event of an emergency like Sam Harris described on December 19th, 2019, on Bret Weinstein's eighth podcast, the idea of a circulating pathogen that no one's ever seen before that kills 75% of the people that get infected will create a moral emergency where mandatory vaccination may be required.
00:22:31:29 - 00:23:19:19
But of course, this whole this whole SID scenario that that Sam proposes in that odd podcast dubiously close to the beginning of the pandemic, the whole thing that he proposes there assumes that a completely safe and highly effective vaccine would become available and that the the rolling it out would have, you know, strict quality controls. It assumes a whole bunch of things that aren't true or likely not even possible that he knows nothing about in terms of scaling up manufacturing of a pharmaceutical product, never mind a heretofore never prepared lipid nanoparticle emulsion kind of thing.
00:23:19:24 - 00:24:10:55
And so the pandemic was essentially created. It was that it was a story told in such a way, an emergency announced in such a way, because governments had previously rehearsed the idea that staying on narrative would be so important in the event of a terrible emergency. But in the reality of whatever was happening here, the worst case scenario response was activated and the worst case scenario response I want to argue included included having people already in place to control a number of aspects of the way the narrative would unfold.
00:24:11:00 - 00:24:37:55
And that's what the Scooby Doo thing is all about. They made it so that there were things in place and we would feel as though we were solving a mystery in real time that just like the governments of the world that were taken by surprise by this novel virus that suddenly seems to have been released in China or escaped in China or leaked in China or spilled in China or sprayed in China.
00:24:38:00 - 00:25:12:16
We were all surprised by it. We were all taken. We don't we all knew nothing. We could only guess what was going on. And this narrative was very cleverly seeded by different research lines, different funding schemes. But those funding schemes were cleverly enough pretty transparent and out in the open right there in the acknowledgments. And so it was easy for anyone with Google and the Internet and PubMed to trace these things back and go, Hey, wait a minute, look what they did in 2015.
00:25:12:21 - 00:25:35:44
And if they really thought that what they were doing was dangerous, of course they would have written it in the paper. But somehow or another it was all right there for us with the with the enrichment of avian flu in 2011 and with the with the same viruses in in 2015, with the chimeric viruses, with with the web.
00:25:35:49 - 00:26:09:48
And so I would argue that those things didn't really prove the existence of pandemic viruses. They didn't even prove the existence of pandemic potential. They may have at best proved the existence of RNA signals that could be misconstrued as something more than they are, especially if you wanted to use proprietary algorithms in something called metagenomic sequencing. And then they conducted all these exercises to convince a bunch of people in government and in the bureaucracies around the world that this was a real issue.
00:26:09:48 - 00:26:47:01
And they've done doing that for decades. And then finally, at the start of the pandemic, a real key issue here is that in the plan to have a horse race of Transfection technologies be the go to countermeasure upon the invocation of the emergency and the enactment or the, let's say, activation of the Prep Act. They knew already that there were several candidates for potential transfer action technologies that could be rolled out as emergency use authorized countermeasures.
00:26:47:06 - 00:27:28:52
And it seemed like there was something to do with Moderna and Inovio and maybe Novavax and and and JNJ or the the the shot from Belgium. And so this this this whole idea that they were going to roll out transfection and that they were going to roll it out in a couple of different ways, maybe adenovirus, maybe lipid nanoparticle, it was important for the for the narrative to be seeded that this virus had some of the more, let's say, easier to predict potential side effects and downsides of transfection.
00:27:28:57 - 00:28:18:16
And so any any heart related problem, any clotting related problem, any stroke related problem, any endothelial damage related problem would be a perfect thing for them to seed into the narrative of the spreading pathogen so that when they rolled out this various transfection technologies, irrespective of which one they decided on, they would have this theme already laid out that this gain of function protein, this spike protein with with watchmaker like precision was created by a laboratory, or at least that rumors circulating would then already plant in the minds of the people that were solving the mystery as people that were the Scooby-Doo teenagers trying to find which which monster we could pull the mask off
00:28:18:16 - 00:28:44:10
of. We were also part of this. Wow. The spike protein is pretty creepy. And that that that fear and cleavage site sure is interesting. There are people who are saying that the fear in cleavage site means that this is the most contagious virus in history. There are people that are saying that the affinity to ace2 is just so off the charts that it means it has to be something that they did on a computer.
00:28:44:15 - 00:29:10:41
And these narratives tied in with the idea that the spike protein itself, that's what a lot of these people said behind the scenes. The spike protein itself was responsible for the heart attacks that were being associated with COVID 19. The spike protein was responsible for the strokes that were being associated with COVID 19. The spike protein was responsible for all these multiorgan systemic effects.
00:29:10:46 - 00:29:41:57
And it might have been because the S1 subunit circulates or because the the ace2 affinity is so high. But the best part about it was, is ceding that narrative of those extra effects beyond respiratory disease and ground glass opacities, which went away very quickly. It was the idea of this untold bounty of extra systemic effects that correlated very well with what they already expected to happen with Transfection.
00:29:42:01 - 00:30:07:41
And so a very crucial play at the beginning of the pandemic was being in the right place at the right time to intercept some key people, some real people that ran into the fire, some real people that went to their state representative and told the truth. Those people early on needed to be co-opted. They needed to be taken aside in a quiet room.
00:30:07:46 - 00:30:35:06
The few guys in suits and told that this was a national security thing, that they weren't sure whether it was a worst case scenario or not, that the military was coordinating the response and that if they wanted to help and we really needed your help, if you wanted to help, you could do X, Y, and Z. And most important is we need the public to think that it is the worst case scenario so that they listened to our instructions.
00:30:35:11 - 00:31:07:03
And so you would be a very vital tool to our response if you could help assure us or help us assure that the US public takes this seriously enough to follow our instructions and eventually take the vaccine that we will offer. And it's already available. Otherwise you can go back home and you'll have to sign an agreement that says you're not going to say anything about this and we'll get someone else to do it.
00:31:07:08 - 00:32:03:27
And they signed either way. They signed an either way, they had to not tell anybody because they were aware of classified things. And so after all of this is said and done, after all these actors are in place, these people who are dead, genuinely good people who have been co-opted, people that are then unwittingly supporting those people and very loud and have big platforms all of these people have wittingly and unwittingly confounded the toxicity of the virus and specifically the spike protein with the toxicity of Transfection trying to blame the vast majority of the the maladaptive bad side effects of the transfection on the spike protein so that if the spike protein had the bad
00:32:03:27 - 00:32:23:21
stuff taken out of it, it might have been okay. If we had had just use the S1, it might have been okay. If we just use the receptor binding domain, it might have been okay. There is lots of different permutations of the might have been okay thing. If you can convince the public that it's the spike protein and that we rather hastily chose that.
00:32:23:25 - 00:33:07:35
Curiously, everyone chose curiously that everyone chose to leave in, even when the new the new spike protein or the current spike protein was nowhere related to the original, they still made it a bivalent vaccine. And I think that this argues for the fact that the spike protein itself was part of the ruse. Perhaps it was an engineered protein that they knew that when used as a vaccine, as a transfection rather, that it would produce a protein that the immune system couldn't ignore and that they would get a very reliable, precise antibody response over repeated injections, which would be the ideal.
00:33:07:35 - 00:33:34:19
Of course, if you're going to roll this out and try to convince the American public or the world that this is an effective thing and being able to show an antibody titer which regularly bumps up, it seems like that's the industry gold standard at this stage. And so virus equals excess deaths has been the the sort of scam the whole time.
00:33:34:19 - 00:34:11:04
Right. That that's been the idea the whole time. Mystery virus equals excess deaths. And when this started was at this where the shade ends there and who told us this all the world leaders, all of our CDC people, all the people on TV, all the virologists, all agreed it was one great big illusion of consensus that these mystery virus, this mystery virus was a new source of death and excess deaths because we were all vulnerable.
00:34:11:09 - 00:34:35:25
(Pierre Kory, MD)
Again, I do not want to diminish the value and the expertise of our national health care societies and international emphasized like the W.H.O. and the CDC. However, they I think those are bodies that are built for peacetime and not for war. And we're at war right now with this virus. And and one of the main issues that we've seen is that they initially came out, all of the national health care societies came out with recommendations.
00:34:35:36 - 00:35:00:00
(Pierre Kory, MD)
It focuses on supportive care only, which is generally you give Tylenol for fever, you treat symptoms, you might give a little hydration nutrition, and you give oxygen and ventilators for support when they can't breathe. And that's reasonable for viral syndrome. But this thing is different, number one. Number two, that strategy is failing. I don't think I need to spend a lot of time showing how badly that's failing.
00:35:00:00 - 00:35:11:58
(Pierre Kory, MD)
The mortality and morbidity rates of this disease are unprecedented. I've been doing critical care for a decade and a half. I do not see mortality rates associated with any severe illness and I seen this this one.
00:35:12:03 - 00:35:40:00
(Jay)
Now to try and paint the whole picture here of of possibilities, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that whatever Dr. Corey ran into in New York City, it was something like an aerosolized toxin that could have caused people to have symptoms, a suite of symptoms that he couldn't explain, that the treatment protocol wouldn't work on.
00:35:40:04 - 00:36:22:07
But then we would really need to investigate it thoroughly. We really would, because the alternative is, of course, that if it works fine for a viral syndrome. What he just said already acknowledges that the principle of the pandemic, that it's a viral syndrome, but this disease is something else. We're at war. It suggests something else. And I hesitate to say much more that because I feel an obligation to.
00:36:22:11 - 00:36:49:48
But this is it's highly dubious because what we saw in New York seemed to be extraordinary for around three and a half weeks and then just disappear and the crazy thing is, it does seem like the timing of his arrival in New York City is kind of after that whole thing. And I could be corrected and I'm fine with that.
00:36:49:53 - 00:37:20:15
But I think we need to be very, very, very introspective now as we move forward and be very careful about be very careful as we look back. Here he is. He is he is saying that the protocols are not working, is not explicitly saying that the protocols may be killing people. But I think we can safely assume that because, again, if you're ventilating people that don't need ventilation in order to reduce spread, you're going to kill people.
00:37:20:20 - 00:37:47:08
Speaker 1
And remember what we said earlier, you don't need you don't need to do a lot. You just need to increase all cause mortality. If turning this knob, pushing that button and not turning that switch will kill 15% more people every month in a hospital, you could do that across the nation and call that spread with the right combination of testing and media blitz.
00:37:47:13 - 00:38:19:59
Speaker 1
And so I would like to more people to consider the possibility that with a very, very well thought out, well tabled, well gamed over several decades trying to figure out how this would work the best. And then with the cooperation of social media, something very, very spectacular could be done. And one of the reasons why I think something very spectacular was done is because no one no one no one will do this math.
00:38:20:04 - 00:38:50:56
Speaker 1
It's not just mystery virus equals excess deaths, because we have discovered that there was a lot of fear, uncertainty, doubt and confusion when they sent all the old doctors home because of the dangerous virus and left hospital administrators ruling over residents while there were do not resuscitate orders out on the street with EMTs, while there were ventilators being used to prevent spread in settings that are never ever used an attached to the internet.
00:38:50:56 - 00:39:40:01
Speaker 1
For some reason, the lack of antibiotic use for a viral syndrome. Remember, Dr. Cory just said that poor use of steroids, the use of remdesivir, midazolam, was started by April, I believe, of 2020, but certainly went on well through 2022 and 2023, and it might still be used today. Opioid deaths were allowed to go bananas. And of course, that helps because if you just call other respiratory disease COVID 19, you don't have any more deaths between now and last year, the death certificate fraud was fueled by financial incentives that happened all over the United States.
00:39:40:01 - 00:40:04:55
Speaker 1
So the numbers are just ridiculously silly and not I mean, not at all reflective of any kind of reality. Track and trace. Do you remember that people were getting paid like $40 an hour to watch two bank phone calls and pretend to track and trace the the contacts of somebody who tests positive? I mean, this was really absurd.
00:40:04:55 - 00:40:37:58
Speaker 1
In 2020 and 2021, they had us wearing masks. They had our children wearing masks in school for a whole year when they were in school. And Bret Weinstein advocated for this for like two and a half years or two years at least. He didn't speak out against closed schools or masking kids in school at all. No developmental biology in his brain at all.
00:40:37:58 - 00:41:01:24
Speaker 1
Apparently it's evolutionary biology that he's a special specialist in. That's why he's never spoke out about the PCR fraud or the lateral test flow or lateral flow test fraud or the whole debacle of the sequencing. But he did have Uri Dagan on his podcast in 2020, a member of Drastic so that he could already start the lab leak debate.
00:41:01:24 - 00:41:56:28
Speaker 1
Ready, ready and waiting the. Scooby Doo settled in 2020. He's seeded the Scooby Doo narrative by having Uri Dagan on his stream. And I was totally sucked into the Scooby Doo narrative by Uri Dagan. I thought I was lucky to be able to review his paper. I thought it was cool that while I was faculty at the University of Pittsburgh, I was sticking it out there and and reviewing the paper about the fear and cleavage site and the likelihood that it was a lab leak fueling the narrative that would eventually kill my friend friends, family members to really I don't think I could have stopped it for them, though.
00:41:56:33 - 00:42:32:04
Speaker 1
Ladies and gentlemen, do you understand what's happening here? We are about to awaken because there is no epidemiological evidence of spread anywhere in the world. There is evidence of mass casualty events that may have been orchestrated by some state actors, projected Medicare costs were avoided. I want to I want to do something here. I just make sure that you understand what I'm saying here, because sometimes I think I'm not very clear if you know anything about the population pyramid.
00:42:32:04 - 00:42:57:18
Speaker 1
Let me see where I am on this drawing. This would be like 100 years old. This would be zero years old. We divide this in half and we put the boys on this side and we put the females on this side. And then if you have this is age, right? And so you have a certain number of kids at the bottom like this, and then you can make this shape.
00:42:57:23 - 00:43:23:58
Speaker 1
It goes all the way up and describe sort of the age pyramid of a population. And we had this pyramid that looked like this. It's not going to be perfect here. I'm just making a point. And this bubble here, this bulge here is pretty significant. It might even be worse, you know, like this. And so that means men and women around retirement age, there's a surplus of them.
00:43:23:58 - 00:43:53:13
Speaker 1
These would be the boomers. An important thing to understand about the American economy and American government. I want you to listen very carefully, because this is totally true. Medicare care is not an option for the American budget. It's written in such a way that that number is not negotiable. When that number comes in, the bill gets paid or it gets charged.
00:43:53:18 - 00:44:24:00
Speaker 1
And the issue with this, this right here is that if this is retirement age, let's say this is the age of average age of death, okay? In order for someone to get from the average age of death and then one year before it, there's usually some Medicare costs in here because they don't just let people die. They try their best to keep people alive.
00:44:24:00 - 00:45:14:20
Speaker 1
You know, you might go into the intensive care unit, this kind of thing. And so the point is, is that this last year of life or so, it's about $500,000 per six months on average, especially if you think about diabetes and and people being overweight and this kind of thing. So for Medicare, this was an impending doom. It was actually an impending doom that they've been writing about in journals and and newspapers and fancy, you know, like things like The Economist for a very long time, predicting that if all of these boomers age out through Medicare, then the cost of their aging out, the cost of their end of life care is going to bankrupt
00:45:14:20 - 00:45:49:42
Speaker 1
the United States. And so when I say that that was funny, when I say that that the projected Medicare costs in the coming eight years were avoided, I'm really referring to that. The idea that people had predicted already that this is this exponential increase in Medicare costs would would really be devastating in the United States. They have they have done an awful lot to set in motion.
00:45:49:42 - 00:46:14:45
Speaker 1
I'm sorry, my ears really itches for my my headphone for some reason. I don't know what happened. Maybe it's just basketball today. Too much sweat. I don't know why that threw me off. All of a sudden, the they they have set up a situation where they have these pneumonia vaccines and RSV vaccines and flu vaccines and COVID vaccines.
00:46:14:45 - 00:46:50:12
Speaker 1
They could, in theory, give an old person for vaccines a year. And certainly these very frail ones, these these, you know, very vulnerable old people that really need the protection of a vaccine. and that's the most frustrating thing. They don't need the protection of the vaccine because of taking a vaccine is a challenge for everybody, even if it is a working vaccine that's given subcutaneously or or taken orally, it's an immune challenge.
00:46:50:16 - 00:47:24:24
Speaker 1
And an intramuscular injection of any combination of substances is going to be a terrible immune challenge with all kinds of potential downsides. You definitely don't want to do to a frail old person, and yet somehow or another they've inverted it. Now, to suggest that these things are so beneficial and so lacking of harm that very old and frail people should update their vaccines, never mind what they eat, never mind what they exercise, never mind what they drink, update their vaccines.
00:47:24:28 - 00:48:05:58
Speaker 1
So it looks like some more Medicare costs are going to be avoided in the very near future by this same mechanism that they engaged with the mythology of the pandemic. And still I'm going to keep harping on it. We need to be very simple and very precise, and for some reason no one is able to do it. We need to advocate for strict liability for these products, and we need to argue that the CCP and the VCP, these these administrative courts that are used to settle with and make the government pay for any potential damages by countermeasure damage, by vaccine, these things need to be discarded because they are a Seventh Amendment violation.
00:48:05:58 - 00:48:31:50
Speaker 1
We need to go back to strict liability and just suing these people in court. So I do think that we have been fooled by a bunch of people that were selected, a bunch of people put in place in order to convince the public that something serious was occurring so that they would follow the countermeasures so the drill would be effective so that they could measure how far they could get and that they could see if they could get everybody to take a transaction.
00:48:31:55 - 00:49:16:55
Speaker 1
And success would have been a 90% penetration rate of the second shot. And they got nowhere close to it. Of course. But what they tried to do is put people in place all along the hypothetical public health train and gave everybody elaborate costume and some lights and stuff and then made them pretend to stop and start the public health train, be wrestling against the public health train being wrestling against the the pandemic train and the way that these people were put and the narrative that these people were given, the little bits of the narrative, the pieces of the Scooby Doo puzzle were given to different people and they stood at different parts of the train
00:49:17:00 - 00:49:57:22
Speaker 1
and collectively pretended to be fighting it, to be resisting it, to be standing up against it, to be accurately representing it. And because social media and mainstream media elevated some of these people to elevate the stories that they were telling, the people that were having a real counter-narrative, the people that were really speaking up, the people that really had something to say were not needed, were not there because they were not part of the limited spectrum of debate that was used to reinforce the presuppositions of the system.
00:49:57:27 - 00:50:28:12
Speaker 1
And I think one of the cleverest ones was hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the use of a probably underutilized pharmaceutical oil that should have been in everybody's medicine cabinet with a whole list of of of indications instead is largely underutilized, underused or not utilized at all. And so they rolled these things out as alternatives for the novel pathogen. And it was very lacking of risk.
00:50:28:17 - 00:50:51:07
Speaker 1
But they even went so far as to have ivermectin have some fake pills around and have that whole narrative of fake pills show up all over. And so again it became about sabotaging the novel cure for the novel virus. Why would the government ever sabotage something that could save a lot of people? A lot of people were stuck on that narrative.
00:50:51:07 - 00:51:29:10
Speaker 1
A lot of people still are stuck on that narrative. The idea that the government purposely sabotaged repurposed drugs in order to make room for in order to make sure there would be an EU A for Amrani. Now, that's a really interesting story and in a lot of ways it's true. But the main reason why they did the hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin fiasco story theater was to make sure that in 2020, in 2021, there was not a single person on the planet who really moved to the point to say there was no evidence of spread.
00:51:29:15 - 00:51:52:17
Speaker 1
There were people that were saying there was no virus, but they weren't articulate enough to say what the hell was going on. Then, and maybe it was too early for them to know. But even as we got more data, even as we got more information, even as the the the information evolved, they stuck to this very limited spectrum of debate like everybody else does.
00:51:52:17 - 00:52:37:07
Speaker 1
And as long as you can look and see that someone's stuck to a very limited spectrum of debate, like there's or stuck to a very limited spectrum of debate, like the, the, the multi systemic effects of the spike protein, then you know that something shady was going on, something fishy was going on at best. And we can hope this for most of the people on the length of this train, we can hope that some of these people were just taken by the fame, by the by the by the comfort and by the notoriety, maybe by the world travel.
00:52:37:12 - 00:53:03:48
Speaker 1
And they thought, well, I've got a part to play. It's like a barbershop quartet. I sing the various part, they sing the ivermectin part, someone else sings the hydroxychloroquine part, someone else sings the the I don't know, the terrible cancer part. But then all together, the whole song sounds great and it sounds really dissident. And it, it all sings really well together.
00:53:03:48 - 00:53:30:36
Speaker 1
And there's a really harmony in and everything and and all the while the novel virus that killed millions and millions more was saved from that likely came from gain of function and will come again has never questioned and in fact all the references that are made are indirect or directly acknowledging its existence, acknowledging its impact, and acknowledging it's the likely return.
00:53:30:41 - 00:54:20:51
Speaker 1
That's why we're still here. That's why we spent the whole Christmas, the last 1 to 3, four Christmases here. And I think this is the best way to sum it up. This Noam Chomsky quote is really just spectacular. The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow a very lively debate within that spectrum, even encourage the more critical and dissident views that gives people the sense that there is a free thinking going on while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of debate.
00:54:20:56 - 00:55:00:20
Speaker 1
I think you need to start we need to start to consider the possibility that many of these people have been co-opted many years ago, brought was pulled aside and said, look, this is how we govern the United States. It is with elaborate manipulation of their opinions. It is through elaborate manipulation of their understanding of reality. And we have succeeded in that to a large extent, the American public does not think about anything that we don't want them to think about, and certainly not with any passion.
00:55:00:25 - 00:55:40:37
Speaker 1
That's how we are governed. And so if you would like to join the governing power of the United States, here is your offer. That was done years before the pandemic and continued right up to pandemic and probably in through the first two or three or four years and right up until Romania in 2023. Remember that I have told you for a long time now that the intellectual dark web is the key to understanding this.
00:55:40:42 - 00:56:13:23
Speaker 1
The key to understanding it is that Marc von Der Rounds in 2011 stood in front of the Chatham House and said that it's too bad we don't we didn't have or knows 2019 and and and whined maybe it was 2000. I got to look it up. I think it was later than that. But he whined that in 2009 when he was the flu commissar of Belgium and there was supposed to be this swine flu that they didn't have things like Facebook and Twitter and all these things.
00:56:13:28 - 00:56:46:46
Speaker 1
He would have been so much easier to control the narrative had they had social media like that. And so in order for a national security event of this nature, a global theater to be executed, they would have had to put people in place. But don't underestimate, they didn't need to tell any of these people that, we're going to run a pandemic in a couple of years, so we want you to get a podcast going and build a little bit of a following before we pull the trigger.
00:56:46:51 - 00:57:14:19
Speaker 1
They don't say that. What they say is that YouTube is starting to become really influential and we want to have some influential people of our own on YouTube and we think you'd be a great candidate for that. You're like an intellectual, you know, we like your brand. Here's me Joe Rogan. He's one of our are our, you know, franchise players.
00:57:14:24 - 00:57:39:00
Speaker 1
We got a few other ones and we're going to look for him and find him. We're going to recruit him and we're going to build an army of big and small influencers that we can start to use to leverage public opinion. Just like Bernays says in the beginning, slides, this is the real ruling power of America. This is the real ruling power of the Western world.
00:57:39:05 - 00:58:17:15
Speaker 1
This is why social media, as it stands right now, is so important and so powerful. The reason why why Elon Musk paid so much money for Twitter. It's not just a show. These are really some of the more impressively new ruling knobs of the Western world. I mean, it would be a bit like adding an extra set of pedals in a car or a it extra steering wheel or something like that.
00:58:17:15 - 00:58:52:37
Speaker 1
You're you're complicating the operating of the of the machine. In this case, they're up there. They're complicating the the operation of the democracy, which should be a republic, but they're complicating. They're tweaking. They're they're they're throwing a wrench in the operation of the republic by confusing and seeding doubt and fear into the populace. This is the Romanian meeting that I am speaking of.
00:58:52:37 - 00:59:47:31
Speaker 1
It happened on the 18th and now 17, 18, 19 of November in 2023. And at this event were Bret Weinstein and Danny Corps and Jessica Rose and Brian Riddle and Harvey Risch and Nick Hudson and Bret Weinstein and Ryan Cole and Robert Malone and Jill Glass Paul Malone and Meryl Nass and Steven Hatfill, among others. And what I have found very frustrating about this particular photograph and what happened afterward was, of course, Robert Malone tweeted that he met and saw a great presentation by Danny Rand Corps and then mentioned the Danny Rand cause data shows that 17 million people were killed by the shot, but doesn't mention the Danny Rand cause data also shows that
00:59:47:31 - 01:00:11:17
Speaker 1
the virus can't cross borders because it doesn't have a passport, apparently. And that indeed has happened multiple times since. He's back. Jessica Rose for example, right after the conference wrote a substack about the breakfast in the hotel and took a selfie with with Denis, but never really specifically mentioned that his data blows the whole narrative out of the water.
01:00:11:22 - 01:00:36:43
Speaker 1
Of course, there would be nothing to talk about on theirs if they hadn't used mass casualty events around the United States. And the world exacerbated all cause mortality, and then told us that it was evidence of spread. There'd be no shot to gripe about. There'd be no transfection technology to claim to be having been invented by you. There'd be none of this.
01:00:36:54 - 01:01:14:20
Speaker 1
None of these arguments would be relevant. And so, incidentally, it does turn out that that that the last half or the last 20 minutes of that video with with Tucker Carlson is actually relevant. And so I want to watch that now before I go to bed tonight in over 11 Dirt. This was a tweet by Brett today, January 8th at 4:20 p.m., dissidents succeeded in upending the COVID narrative, a historic victory, but instead coming together and gearing up for the rematch.
01:01:14:20 - 01:01:50:06
Speaker 1
The Goliath is clearly planning. A fair fraction are overtaken by a petty infighting. Why dissidents tend to be lone wolves rather than team players. Interesting theory Most dissidents have no experience wielding any power or influence at all. And so to play the game like novices now, I do believe I do believe that this tweet then actually is an admission that he does have some experience wielding power or influence.
01:01:50:11 - 01:02:16:52
Speaker 1
It does mean that he feels as though he's wielding some power and influence and that other people who wield power and influence are challenging him. He doesn't like that. We shouldn't have any infighting. I seem to remember Robert Malone saying that a few times. I remember Charles Ritchie saying that too. I remember people calling me a divider. I'm getting sick and tired of MIT doctor quiz streams with all those on them.
01:02:16:57 - 01:02:42:24
Speaker 1
Why does he keep dividing all the time? I'm not dividing. I keep picking on the same people, the same people who have this big commitment to lies that somehow or another they forgot where they were for 2020 and 2021. When my kids were using masks to play in band, they that happened because of Bret Weinstein and everybody else, like Jordan Peterson.
01:02:42:28 - 01:03:27:15
Speaker 1
They didn't have any special insight into the pandemic. It's absolutely despicable that in his his podcast in June of 2021, when he came with with with Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch, that Bret Weinstein said that he had a background in immunology, I would challenge you to find any podcast he's ever done where he's taught, explained any phenomenon in immunology to a satisfactory level.
01:03:27:19 - 01:04:01:06
Speaker 1
This guy is a an absolute player. He is an absolute player. There is absolutely no way that these pictures behind me, these elaborate studio photo photography shoots these these things up here. This over here is evidence of a of a meeting. This is evidence of a meeting. And it's a it's a it's the original dinner. Do you see the people that are at this dinner?
01:04:01:06 - 01:04:43:59
Speaker 1
It's it's SHAPIRO and Rubin and Rogan and Harris and Eric Weinstein and Peterson. And who took the picture? Brett? These photographs up here. Rubin, Harris, Weinstein hanging. And this guy, Eric Weinstein, with a black umbrella over him. You don't need to be a crazy symbologist to know that a black umbrella means something funny. I mean, Jordan Peterson with a triangle photograph, is that just accidentally chosen?
01:04:44:04 - 01:05:11:44
Speaker 1
I'm sorry, ladies and gentlemen, but I'm not I'm not going to play any. I'm not playing anymore. This is really wrong. He knows exactly what he's doing when he says these things. Goliath has read and listen to enough private correspondence to play the dissident rivalries, jealously and mistrust like a fiddle. No, no, that's incorrect. Some of us have experienced the playing of being played like a fiddle.
01:05:11:49 - 01:05:34:39
Speaker 1
That's why you're if he's afraid, everyone's afraid of my story. Because any one of these people that has interacted with me and has played me has exposed themselves and they all know it. They all know that I know. I know from their signal chats, I know from their private messages. I know from what they didn't say. I know from what they didn't answer.
01:05:34:39 - 01:06:11:46
Speaker 1
I know from how they didn't call back. And Brett Weinstein, I think I know better than almost anyone else that has messed with me in these years. I've seen his true colors too often and from too many angles. He has a very, very sensitive ego. Every single idea that isn't his is got to be reformulated in such a way so that he can claim it for himself.
01:06:11:51 - 01:06:42:52
Speaker 1
He's the most disingenuous learner in in in social media history, even though it's so short. And I'm very, very frustrated with him. I'm frustrated with him because he talked to me for a very long time on signal and made it seem like that I was struggling to explain to get him to understand the biology that I was trying to argue for in 2022, and now we're in 2024.
01:06:42:57 - 01:07:09:20
Speaker 1
And while I was in that signal chat with him, of course he had already recorded an interview with Robert F Kennedy Jr, already recorded an interview 3 hours long in his house. Never mentioned it, of course, that any of this happened, incidentally, when I told that Signal chat group that that Robert F Kennedy Jr had called me and asked me to be an advisor on the book.
01:07:09:25 - 01:07:47:39
Speaker 1
Brad's first response was Why you eventually, Brett told me that he couldn't really understand what I was saying. And even though, you know, I can show you a picture, for example, of him saying, okay, say it again like you're fired, speaking to a five year old, he said that lot in that single chat. And and and Brett Weinstein was wearing a bandana and goggles for almost a year.
01:07:47:43 - 01:08:13:05
Speaker 1
No, I'm not. I'm not done anymore. I'm not I'm not going to accept this Excuse of, you know, mistakes were made and that kind of thing. That's that is what I'm saying. There were mistakes made by people and some mistakes were not mistakes. Some mistakes were chosen. Some things were chosen because they were a script given to you for comfort and fame.
01:08:13:10 - 01:08:39:20
Speaker 1
And I think that's what these people did. I really do. I think these people are part of an elaborate I mean, really awful plan to usurp our country, to usurp the West, whatever you want to call it. I got to find this. Hold on. One second. This guy that this and this.
01:08:39:25 - 01:08:42:28
Speaker 2
Yes, you're speaking in grand terms.
01:08:42:31 - 01:08:45:34
Speaker 1
That I'm going to go to the part where we reference documents.
01:08:45:48 - 01:08:48:20
Speaker 4
Our Constitution doesn't describe.
01:08:48:25 - 01:08:57:27
Speaker 1
And I'm going to speed it up a little bit. And here we go.
01:08:57:32 - 01:09:01:28
Speaker 4
From your rights during time. Okay. Okay. What rights simply are what they are and they're not.
01:09:01:33 - 01:09:02:09
Speaker 1
In the right place.
01:09:02:09 - 01:09:13:59
Speaker 4
I'm just because there's a disease spreading, but nonetheless, people's willingness to accept the erosion of their rights because of a public health emergency has allowed this tyranny to to use it as a Trojan horse.
01:09:14:04 - 01:09:50:48
Speaker 1
And so I want you to just hear what he just said there, because it's really important to understand that he doesn't see himself as part of that. He doesn't see himself at all as having played any role in the public, having slipped into this trap. That's the dishonesty and the lack of humility that is driving anyone nuts, that has a problem with Bret Weinstein being an ever rising star in this dissident movement is as though he was always driving the car, always knew where we were going.
01:09:50:52 - 01:09:58:15
Speaker 1
It was always his idea to go camping listen carefully.
01:09:58:15 - 01:10:15:18
Speaker 4
Police corruption because it's the turnkey totalitarian planet, World Health Organization. He's above the level of nations and it is going to be in a position, if these provisions passed, to dictate to nations how they ought to treat their own citizens to override their constitutions, despite what Petro just told you. So that is frightening. It's not inherently about health.
01:10:15:23 - 01:10:44:49
Speaker 4
What I think has happened is the fact of a possible pandemic causes a loophole in the mind. It's not a loophole in our governance documents. Our Constitution doesn't describe exemptions from your rights during a time of pandemic emergency. Your rights simply are what they are and are not supposed to go anywhere just because there's a disease spreading. But nonetheless, people's willingness to accept the erosion of their rights because of a public health emergency has allowed this tyranny to use it as a Trojan horse.
01:10:44:54 - 01:11:26:01
Speaker 1
And so some people like it like Robert F Kennedy Jr were speaking out about how irrespective of the public health excuse that's given the public health worst case scenario that's given, we shouldn't secede our rights to these people. The lockdowns are not the way that erosion of our rights is not the way that that closing down our economies and schools was not the way there were people who were arguing against this from the very beginning who knew that masks couldn't stop particles sizes as described.
01:11:26:06 - 01:11:47:44
Speaker 1
There were people who are already talking about the PCR couldn't possibly be as accurate as they say it is. There's no way. What do we know about the background? What is this? What is going on? There were people saying this stuff, but it wasn't Bret Weinstein. Bret Weinstein and his wife were saying that it might be it most likely is bushmeat.
01:11:47:49 - 01:11:59:01
Speaker 1
And then even if we find out that this is not from a market, we should still fix the problem of bushmeat. Because isn't that where AIDS came from?
01:11:59:06 - 01:12:01:34
Speaker 3
That is.
01:12:01:38 - 01:12:56:58
Speaker 1
Bret Weinstein. Bandana and goggles. That is Bret Weinstein. When when Sam Harris says that there won't be any room to tolerate these people when there's a virus kills 75% of everyone it infects, it will be a moral emergency. Bret didn't say anything because he didn't have principles. Then and Bret did not speak up against lockdowns or masks or shutting down schools because he didn't have principles then either because he and other people then or soon after sold out, co-opted, went along with or were elevated because they went along with maybe it's that sophisticated.
01:12:56:58 - 01:13:26:04
Speaker 1
Maybe they just picked random people who were silly enough to go along and then they elevated them. But I highly doubt it. I think it's much more likely because of his connections, because of the way that his family is connected, the way that his friends are connected to who he's connected to, who his brothers connected to. It's much more likely that he was part of a selection.
01:13:26:09 - 01:13:50:26
Speaker 1
The intellectual dark web was not a spontaneous group of dudes from brawls with shows I just saw recently. I think it's very safe to say that all the brawls with shows, especially the brawls with shows before the pandemic, especially the brothers with shows that talked about the tolerability of anti-vaxxers right before the pandemic started those brawls with shows.
01:13:50:31 - 01:14:03:50
Speaker 1
that's pretty shady stuff. I think we got them, ladies and gentlemen. Hook We got them all. We got them all. We can see them now. All we got to do is just stop and look.
01:14:03:51 - 01:14:24:28
Speaker 4
And I think that's also it's something people need to become aware of, that there are a number of features of our environment that are basically there are blind spots that we can't see. Past vaccine was one, and I know I was an enthusiast about vaccines. I still believe deeply in the elegance of vaccines as they should exist, but I'm now very alarmed at how they're produced.
01:14:24:28 - 01:14:28:16
Speaker 4
I'm even more alarmed at what has been called a vaccine that doesn't meet the definition. Right.
01:14:28:19 - 01:14:51:40
Speaker 1
That because now be careful you don't miss misunderstand that. He's appalled by how they're produced and he's also worried about these new ones. It's all the same. He's not talking about the old ones yet and he won't talk about the old ones because he is a meddler. He's never going to have the revelation, never, ever, ever that the entire vaccine schedule in America is criminal.
01:14:51:45 - 01:15:16:50
Speaker 1
He's never going to compare on screen on his podcast, the vaccine schedule in Norway with the vaccine schedule in America, and then scratch his head and go, Wow, I wonder why it's that way. Because he believes in the miracle of vaccines. He believes in the elegance of vaccines, and he believes that him RNA is even more elegant. Listen carefully.
01:15:16:55 - 01:15:21:24
Speaker 1
This is not anyone that is on our team.
01:15:21:28 - 01:15:40:17
Speaker 4
Many of us believe that vaccines were extremely elegant, low harm, high efficacy method of preventing disease when they called the Somani technology a vaccine. Many of us gave it more credibility than we should have called it a gene transduction technology. We would have thought, Wait, what? You know that that sounds highly novel, that sounds dangerous.
01:15:40:18 - 01:16:16:45
Speaker 1
And now he's saying that he did it or. We did it because I didn't do it. You see, that's the problem. This is where I start to get a little upset because he was on a signal chat with me in late 2021, I believe, all the way through a lot of 2022 where I explain this crap over and over again, introduced him to the word Transfection tried to explain to him that it's not something I'm making up and even after links and just saying, just dude, just Google it, it still didn't stick.
01:16:16:49 - 01:16:47:12
Speaker 1
His wife mentioned it once on the podcast, but They don't use that term regularly. This is one of the first times again that he's ever used it, and he explicitly admits that had we called it a transfection from the beginning, it might not have taken off. I gave him that opportunity. I gave everybody that opportunity. I called it a transfection in writing on Medium in May of 2021, and I was already saying it in 2020.
01:16:47:16 - 01:17:11:01
Speaker 1
I was already saying no. In 2020. I was a little afraid to say that it didn't help anybody that already took it. I didn't really see that as being very smart at that time to say that. But now I know it should have been said. That's what I thought. You see, the problem is, is that Brett was really certain back then.
01:17:11:06 - 01:17:38:16
Speaker 1
He's really certain now that his story is correct, that he did the best he could, that he didn't make any egregious mistakes except for maybe the mask thing. But that didn't hurt anybody. The masks did every in the beginning it was the illusion of consensus with the cars full of people with masks and the big shops full of people with masks on is a little an illusion of consensus.
01:17:38:16 - 01:18:08:51
Speaker 1
And it was created by these people and it was fueled by this person wearing a bandana on his neck for nine or ten or 11 months, sharing selfies with a bandana and a and eye goggles, advocating almost two years later for harder lockdowns. Next time, if we would have done it right, this wouldn't have happened. Zero COVID possible at some point.
01:18:08:56 - 01:18:33:25
Speaker 1
This is the same guy. There were people that were millennia ahead of him, and some of them he was talking to and ignoring.
01:18:33:30 - 01:18:40:37
Speaker 4
What we know about the long term implications. But because they called it a vaccine, people were much, really, much more willing to accept it. Public health functions the same way.
01:18:40:42 - 01:19:18:57
Speaker 1
He called it a vaccine because they called it a vaccine because we we gave it more credit. He gave it more credit. I didn't I called it a transfection. He called it a vaccine. They actually called it an investigational vaccine and an emergency use authorized countermeasure. He's the one who went on and on about it being a vaccine and he sees no responsibility for it, even though he's called it a vaccine all through 2023.
01:19:18:57 - 01:19:48:57
Speaker 1
Are you kidding me? Do you see the hypocrisy here? Do you see why it's not as simple as we can divide everybody that this movement is starting to fracture because people's egos are getting too big, because people have never are used to wielding influence? I'm not wielding influence, Brett. I'm trying to save the world for my grandchildren. As crazy as that sounds, what else do I got to do?
01:19:48:57 - 01:20:15:57
Speaker 1
How else can I try? I got to get these bad ideas that were laid down by bad people in the beginning of 2020, all through the end of 2021. We got to get these bad ideas out of these kids heads. And Brett Weinstein is one of the people that put those bad ideas in those kids heads with his complete lack of insight and complete lack of principles in 2020 and 2021.
01:20:15:57 - 01:21:03:45
Speaker 1
And when he finally found his principles, he still didn't question lack of evidence of spread. He distilled in question the fidelity of virology. He still didn't question the overall efficacy of transfection. He just questioned the possible side downsides of it. This is, of course, something that they're going to double down on over and over again. He's never going to admit that, that he cooperated with some different weaponized piles of money in order to get comfort and promised fame, take care of his family, feed his family, save up for the the currency crash, get some gold in his house.
01:21:03:45 - 01:21:32:04
Speaker 1
I don't know what he got. Maybe a guarantee that, you know, his family would be protected or something like that? I have no idea. Maybe he just did it for podcasts and for for sponsors. But there's no question in my mind that he's probably smart enough to have known that masks wouldn't work. He's probably smart enough to have that.
01:21:32:09 - 01:21:58:25
Speaker 1
Masks on. Children would be terrible. He's probably smart enough to know that masks on children and making them stay home for a year and use iPads to go to school would probably be terrible. Like way, way, way worse for some kids and for other kids way, way worse for some school systems than other school districts. He's smart enough to know all that.
01:21:58:30 - 01:22:24:49
Speaker 1
But did he did he debate any of those things? Did he advocate for any of those things? Did he see that as a violation of our rights? Did he have any principles with regard to the development of our children? and he still doesn't he's not apologetic for it. He didn't make it. He didn't make those policies. So he was under no obligation to know what the right thing to say was.
01:22:24:54 - 01:22:58:22
Speaker 1
He got $500,000 to resign from Evergreen. He didn't suffer. He didn't lose. He got a half a million dollars. I guarantee you the University of Pittsburgh didn't give me a half a million dollars. And I guarantee you I've made a half a million dollars doing this dumb stream. It's not a dumb stream, though. It's a great stream. Share it with your friends.
01:22:58:35 - 01:23:15:43
Speaker 4
If you think about it. Public health, stuff like your relationship with your doctor, your personal health ought to be very important to you. But there are ways in which things that happen on the population level affect your personal health and your doctor's not a position to do anything about, right? So somebody dumping pollution into a stream from which you're pulling fish, you know, you might detect the harm at the population level.
01:23:15:43 - 01:23:29:17
Speaker 4
You might get a regulation of the population level in order to protect you. Your doctor's not position your filter record. So the idea that public health is essentially a place to improve all of our well-being is real. But once you decide that there's something above doctors relative to your health, then that can be an excuse for manner of tyranny.
01:23:29:22 - 01:23:44:16
Speaker 4
Public health has been adopted. It's like it's like the sheep's clothing that has allowed the wolf to go after our rights because in fury it's trying to protect us from harms that we would like to it generate such fear. It's such a huge scale that it weakens people's moral immune systems. Absolutely. Something that we never accepted was. Absolutely.
01:23:44:16 - 01:23:51:19
Speaker 4
And as you know, and as as I know, when we raised questions about what was being being delivered to us under the guise of public health.
01:23:51:32 - 01:24:35:55
Speaker 1
He did not raise any questions, meaningful questions until 2000, the end of 2021 at best. And we looked at it yesterday or the day before, rather, the original breakout podcast with Bret Weinstein Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch presented the idea that infection plus vaccination vaccination alone or the Freemason secret recipe of ivermectin could result in a sort of a sort of, let's say, hybrid herd immunity that would allow all three of these gentlemen, even though they're strangers from different social circles, that should be socially isolated from one another, to hang out without masks in a room and be safe.
01:24:36:00 - 01:25:01:44
Speaker 1
That was his big that was his big breakthrough. While almost a year earlier I would been sent I would been asked to send in my badge and keys because it wasn't safe for me to come into the university anymore because I stood up and said that transfection of our old peoples probably pretty dumb, but transfection of our kids is going to be absurd.
01:25:01:44 - 01:25:20:26
Speaker 1
And that's what they're going to do. And all of us have to stand up because we all use transfection in our labs. How can we not know that this a crazy idea? We wouldn't transfix our children, but that's where we're going to be in a year if we don't speak up. they're not the same as transactions. It can't be the same.
01:25:20:31 - 01:25:49:39
Speaker 1
don't. Don't be silly. And Brett never said that. Brett never said that until it was way too late, until every college kid had taken a pair, until every old person had already taken a pair. He never said anything. He might have expressed some skepticism or that my family's going to wait, but I bet you he didn't. And I'd love for a link to find out if he did, because I bet he didn't.
01:25:49:44 - 01:26:10:39
Speaker 4
We were demonized as if we had a moral defect. It wasn't even a cognitive defect where we were failing to understand the wisdom of the vaccine. It was a moral defect. We were failing to protect others who were vulnerable by questioning these things. So the idea that health is at stake in some vague, larger sense, that requires us to to override the natural relationship between doctors and patients is itself a coup against medicine by something else.
01:26:10:44 - 01:26:25:33
Speaker 4
And we need to become aware of that just just to check kind of like the souls of the people who are running all of this. The public health established international public perception now that some researchers believe up to 17 million people could have been killed by these shots, has any international public officials said, well, hold on a second, we need to get to the bottom of that.
01:26:25:33 - 01:26:40:23
Speaker 4
Is that any response people charge for public health? Well, I'm trying to think globally, whether they're good examples. There's certainly some folks who have stood up in the European Parliament, but I mean, in World Health Organization, the CDC. No, I don't think so. I don't think we have we have not seen an acknowledgment of the harm and error.
01:26:40:28 - 01:26:54:53
Speaker 4
They don't have Internet access. They know that. Well, that's the incredible thing, is I still see claims that just simply if they initially had believed them, then they are long ago falsified. But they're still being advanced for whoever hasn't noticed. You know, the idea that it's a bad idea to vaccinate your kids with mini shots being one of them.
01:26:55:06 - 01:27:02:15
Speaker 4
Right. To the extent that there was a panic that caused us to give these shots to people who couldn't possibly benefit from them, you would expect us to have backed that off extreme.
01:27:02:25 - 01:27:26:01
Speaker 1
And so he's still not at the stage where he's saying the transaction is beneficial for anybody that's healthy and it wouldn't have helped anyone and in fact, it would be more likely to hurt the frail old. We're still not close to that yet. Even though Danny Rand caused data, which they just referenced, 17 million. I just showed you a picture of the Brett Weinstein met him over in Romania.
01:27:26:06 - 01:27:45:24
Speaker 1
He's about to say that in Romania. Again, but he's not saying the important parts that there's no evidence of spread. We're not going to mention it. And this other thing, what I just said, I want to get back to that again to make sure.
01:27:45:28 - 01:27:49:12
Speaker 4
That caused us to give these shots to people who couldn't possibly benefit from them.
01:27:49:19 - 01:28:20:37
Speaker 1
Yeah, and Danny Rand course data also shows that the shots are are exponentially more dangerous for the elderly. So Danny's seen the effects the shots on the elderly. So the whole narrative that we have to give it to the vulnerable and the vulnerable are these sick people, these immunocompromised people or these these elderly is exactly antithetical to what we actually know about the dangers of transfection and about how hard it is on our body.
01:28:20:42 - 01:29:00:47
Speaker 1
It's a permanent, potentially permanently damaging thing because your immune system is going to be permanently cockeyed. And he's not saying those things right here. Now, listen carefully. He didn't question all vaccines. He just barely questions this one. And in theory, it's still very elegant and he's still leaving the window open for there to be some demographic of people for whom the the the the risk to benefit ratio is still favorable for the shot.
01:29:00:52 - 01:29:15:27
Speaker 1
I still am very sure that Bret Weinstein believes there is a significant portion of the population for which the transfection to the spike protein still has a favorable risk benefit ratio. You can hear him talking about it.
01:29:15:32 - 01:29:35:30
Speaker 4
Expect us to have back that off extremely rapidly as it became impossible to defend those shots. And yet because there still presumably some market for it, I'm we are we are still doing so we are living some crazy story in which things that are perfectly obvious are still somehow have not lodged themselves in the official public record. And, you know, I think that has a lot to do with, frankly, the death of journalism.
01:29:35:34 - 01:29:51:03
Speaker 4
A lot of us are doing jobs that we didn't train for either and are doing some journalistic job. But we certainly can train for we train to think about biology. And, you know, we do that in front of a camera and so that functions as a kind of stand in for journalism. But the handful of journalists who still exist and I think without exception, are not scientifically trained.
01:29:51:07 - 01:30:15:41
Speaker 4
Right. You know, Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, you don't have very many people doing investigative journalism and the ones who are doing it, they don't have the skill set that would make this a natural topic to investigate. So we have to put up some kind of new institution that will allow us to do this job well. And presumably that will involve taking a few investigative journalists who remember how to do that job and the few scientists, doctors who are willing to still do their job and, you know, put us together.
01:30:15:41 - 01:30:34:30
Speaker 4
Right. Podcast is the right place to do it. If that's all we got, that's all we got. But there's got to be a better a better method. So if this is being one of right to the extent that there was a panic that caused us to give these shots to people who couldn't possibly benefit from them, you would expect us to have backed that off extremely rapidly as it became impossible to defend those shots.
01:30:34:30 - 01:30:53:15
Speaker 4
And yet because there still presumably some market for it, we are we are still doing so. We are living some crazy story in which things that are perfectly obvious are still somehow have not lodged themselves in the official public record. And, you know, I think that has a lot to do with, frankly, the death of journalism. A lot of us are doing jobs that we didn't train for either and are doing some journalistic job.
01:30:53:15 - 01:31:03:08
Speaker 4
But we certainly in Frankfurt, we train to think about biology. And, you know, we do that in front of a camera. And so that functions as a kind of stand in for journalism. But the handful of journalists who still exist I'm I think with Alex.
01:31:03:14 - 01:31:29:33
Speaker 1
I thought they were at a teaching university. I thought they taught biology. Now they're journalists, so at least they're being honest because I've never seen them or heard them teach anything, really. They talk about stuff, they report things. They are kind of like journalists. I guess I'm kind of a journalist in a way. I mean, in a way.
01:31:29:38 - 01:31:35:07
Speaker 1
But I also see myself as a teacher. I think it's it's it reveals something.
01:31:35:07 - 01:31:54:01
Speaker 4
There are not scientific training, right. You know. Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, you don't have very many people doing investigative journalism and the ones who are who are doing it, they don't have the skill set that would make this a natural topic to investigate. So we have to put up some kind of new institution that will allow us to do this job well.
01:31:54:07 - 01:32:07:31
Speaker 4
Presumably, that will involve taking a few investigative journalists who remember how to do that job and the few scientists and doctors who are willing to still do their job and, you know, put us together, I guess is the right place to do it. If that's all we got, that's all we got. But there's got to be a better a better method.
01:32:07:35 - 01:32:42:46
Speaker 1
Is he talking about a dream team of journalists and scientists that can really break down science communication and drop a nuclear bomb of clarity on society? Because that sounds like a pretty big game to me. That sounds like, well, let's get some already established CIA operatives, together with some already established weaponized piles of money agents and some other criminal syndicates altogether to control the narrative about the alternative to the modern system or the alternative information system.
01:32:42:46 - 01:32:55:00
Speaker 1
It sounds like intellectual dark Web 2.0 and he wants to be a part of it. He wants to be the head of it. He's part of that dream team. Holy man.
01:32:55:04 - 01:33:07:51
Speaker 4
So if this is ratified or signed on to by the Unites States in May, six months, well, it sounds like it's it we don't know. I will say I have very little hope that the U.S. will derail this. I have the sense that whatever has captured.
01:33:08:00 - 01:33:29:00
Speaker 1
Is in the U.S. like a funder of the WHO. I thought we sent a lot of money, The Who. So if the who is changing its its treaty, then doesn't some portion of the United States government or some forces in the United States want that, then I thought we gave a lot of money to the who. I know that that Trump stopped for a while, but I thought that started again.
01:33:29:09 - 01:33:33:58
Speaker 1
We don't we even give the most. Correct me if I'm but.
01:33:34:03 - 01:33:51:39
Speaker 4
Our government is driving this as well. And so, in effect, the U.S. wants this change. It will, in fact, you know, in the same way that the Five Eyes agree to mutually violate the rights of each other's citizens, because that was not prevented in any of our constitutions. I think the U.S. wants something to force it to violate our constitutional protections.
01:33:51:39 - 01:34:00:24
Speaker 4
And the World Health Organization is going to be that entity. That said, I have recently been to the Czech Republic and I've been to Romania and I've.
01:34:00:28 - 01:34:01:00
Speaker 2
Heard.
01:34:01:04 - 01:34:20:40
Speaker 4
The parts of the former Eastern Bloc that there is resistance, that people who have faced tyranny in living memory are much less ready to accept these changes and that they are actually beginning to mount a response. I worry that it will be too thin and easily defeated, especially if they do not understand that actually the world is depending on them.
01:34:20:45 - 01:34:38:51
Speaker 4
Traditionally, the countries we traditionally think of as part of the West are compromised and that these countries which have more recently joined or rejoined the West are the best hope. We've got that they are in a position to derail this set of provisions and that we are depending on them to do it. So I just want to end for a few moments on your on the overview here.
01:34:38:51 - 01:35:08:20
Speaker 4
So you have all these remarkable things converging, a single 12 month period, war, pestilence, political unrest, apparently unsolvable political unrest. What do you think we're looking at in the West? What is this moment and how does it end? Well So I have long been interested in questions of good governance and the West. And I'm sad to report that I think the West has actually collapsed and what we owe these and nebulous echo the values of the West still function, but they function in a vague way.
01:35:08:20 - 01:35:12:04
Speaker 4
And we have seen that they can evaporate quickly under the right circumstances.
01:35:12:09 - 01:35:25:31
Speaker 1
This sounds like an announcement to me. I don't think it sounds like a cautionary statement that we need to pull up. It sounds like it's already happened. That's that that's frightening to me.
01:35:25:31 - 01:35:43:46
Speaker 4
I'm I suspect and I really don't know. I don't think that they can at least echo the report that I think the West has actually collapsed. And what we are left with is now and nebulous echo the values of the West still function, but they function in a vague way. And we have seen that they can evaporate quickly under the right circumstances.
01:35:43:51 - 01:36:09:34
Speaker 4
I suspect and I really don't know, I don't think anybody knows, but I suspect that some powerful set of forces has decided that consent of the governed is too dangerous to tolerate and that it has begun to unhook. And we do not know how this works. We can see some of the partners who are involved in this, but I don't think we know ultimately who's driving it or where they're going.
01:36:09:43 - 01:36:28:46
Speaker 4
I think many of the notions that we picked up about nations and who our friends are and who our enemies are are they're now more misleading than they are informative. In other words, I don't think the U.S. has an enemy called China. I think there are elements within the U.S. that are partnered within with elements within the Chinese Communist Party for practical reasons.
01:36:28:58 - 01:36:51:00
Speaker 4
And so, you know, the the notion that these two parties are competing with each other just distracts us from what's actually taking place. But let's just put it this way. We have a large global population. Most people have no useful role through no fault of their own. They have not been given a an opportunity in life to find a useful way to contribute.
01:36:51:10 - 01:37:17:38
Speaker 4
And I wonder if the rent seeking elites that have hoarded so much power are not unhooking our rights because effectively they're afraid of some global French Revolution moment as people that they've been betrayed and left without good options. Is that what we're seeing? Certainly feels like we're facing an end game where important properties that would once have been preserved, all parties because they might need them one day are now being dispensed with.
01:37:17:38 - 01:37:39:51
Speaker 4
And we're being you know, we're watching our governmental structures and every one of our institutions captured, hollowed out, turned into a paradoxical inversion of what it was designed to do. It's not an accident. Whether they you know, the thing that worries me most, actually, is that whatever is driving this is not composed of diabolical geniuses who at least have some plan for the future, but it's being driven by people who actually do not know what kind of hell they're inviting.
01:37:39:55 - 01:37:58:42
Speaker 4
Yes, they're going to create a kind of chaos from which humanity may well not emerge. And I get the sense that unless they have some remarkable plan that is not obvious, that they are just simply drunk with power and putting everyone, including themselves in tremendous by taking apart the structures on which we depend. How do you see my last question?
01:37:58:42 - 01:38:12:32
Speaker 4
How do you see your I mean, you're speaking in in grand terms that three years ago I might have left out. I'm not laughing at all and I think you're absolutely right. But you're also choosing as a 50 ish man when you say this stuff out loud and to pursue the truth as you find it and to talk about it.
01:38:12:39 - 01:38:29:39
Speaker 4
So how do you did you decide to do that and how do you think that ends? Well, you know, we are all the products of whatever developmental environment produced us. And as I've said on multiple topics where my family has found itself in very uncomfortable and sometimes dangerous circumstances because we speak out. I don't think I had a choice.
01:38:29:43 - 01:38:53:37
Speaker 4
I just I, I literally cannot understand. I would sleep at night how I would look at myself in the mirror if I didn't say what needed to be said. And, you know, I stopped listening. Very good speech by Bobby Jr, either us or Libertarian. He was at the Liberty Conference in Memphis, and the last thing he said in that speech struck me to my core, something I thought often and said almost never.
01:38:53:42 - 01:39:13:53
Speaker 4
But there are fates far worse than death. And I think for my part, I have I have lived an incredible life. I have I there's plenty I still want to do. And I am not eager to leave the planet any earlier than I have to. I have a marvelous family. I live a wonderful and I've got lots of things on a bucket list.
01:39:13:53 - 01:39:33:57
Speaker 4
I got lots of things on my bucket list. However, humanity is depending on everybody who has a position from which to see what is taking place, to grapple with what it might mean to describe it so that the public understands where their interests are. It is depending on us to do what needs to be done if we're to have a chance of delivering a planet to our children and our grandchildren, that is worthy of them.
01:39:33:57 - 01:39:50:54
Speaker 4
If we're going to deliver a system that allows them to live meaningful, healthy lives, we have to speak up and I don't know I don't know how to get people to do that. I'm very hesitant to urge others to put themselves or their families in danger. And I know that everybody's circumstances are different. Some people are struggling simply to feed a family, keep a roof over their heads.
01:39:51:00 - 01:40:10:00
Speaker 4
Those people obviously have a great deal less liberty with respect to standing up and saying what needs to be said. But this is really it's what we call in game theory a collective action problem. Everybody responds to their personal well-being. If everybody says that's too dangerous to stand up, you know, I'm not suicidal, I'm I can't do it, then not enough people stand up to change the course of history.
01:40:10:04 - 01:40:32:29
Speaker 4
If people somehow put aside the obvious danger to their ability to earn and maybe to their lives of saying what needs to be said, then we greatly outnumber those we are pitted against. They are ferociously powerful. But I would also point out this interesting error. So I call the force that we're up against Goliath. Just so I remember what the battle is, though.
01:40:32:29 - 01:40:50:25
Speaker 4
I have made a terrible mistake and made it most egregiously during COVID, which is it took all of the competent people, took all of the trade, and it shoved them out of the institutions where they were hanging on. And it created in so doing the dream Team created every player you could possibly want.
01:40:50:31 - 01:41:15:09
Speaker 1
And so what I want you to understand what I believe is happening here is that, yes, this is true, that the pandemic allowed the United States government and the governments of the world the weaponized piles of money that control social media to find and chart the individuals would react in a dissident way that we act, react in a skeptical way.
01:41:15:14 - 01:41:52:23
Speaker 1
And when Robert Malone claimed that he was censored on LinkedIn and therefore he had to go to gab, those same people went to gab and another list was made. The people that wouldn't follow the the taking temperature and masking at universities. Another list was made. And so all of these lists have been compiled and cross-examined and cross referenced and people like myself probably show up on ten of these lists.
01:41:52:28 - 01:42:36:15
Speaker 1
And what he's speaking of, it didn't happen to him. The illusion here, the enchantment here is for you to believe that what happened to him at Evergreen puts him ahead of this, puts him already on the outspoken side of things. And so therefore, you're supposed to default. He wants you to default to the idea that since he already out in 2017 about about equity issues and who lost his job for $5,000, that now we should assume that in 2020 he would have obviously been very far ahead of this.
01:42:36:19 - 01:43:13:48
Speaker 1
In 2021, he would have been even farther ahead of this. No, in 2020, he was reassuring that the narrative of a lab leak was already out there and circulating in the background so that the worst case scenario would be plausible, so that the worst case scenario that Kevin McCarron was selling would be plausible. So that the worst case scenario that Richard Fleming was selling would be possible, so that the worst case scenario that some of these these virologists were claiming would be possible so that the the gain of function papers would be relevant.
01:43:13:53 - 01:43:45:39
Speaker 1
He had Yuri Dagan on the Russian entrepreneur, who seems to claims to be investigating longevity and was a member of drastic and a guy who blocked me on Twitter the moment that I decided that I think we should fight against Transfection more than we should worry about the origin of the virus anymore. And I still can't see his tweets on Twitter even though I reviewed his paper about the fear and cleavage site while I was still a faculty at the University of Pittsburgh.
01:43:45:39 - 01:44:14:16
Speaker 1
You can look it up. I reviewed four of those fear and cleavage site papers because I got sucked in hook, line and sinker by a group of people called Drastic who were publishing those papers. Mona and her husband, they published the Mo Yang Mein paper. We're in drastic. That's how I met them and could become a reviewer. That's how Yuri Dagan and I got connected.
01:44:14:25 - 01:44:38:40
Speaker 1
That's how that's why Dan and I were in Drastic together, because I was reviewing Dan's paper. And so I got used. I got sucked in, I got my ego stroked. you're going to help us. this is great. You're such an integral part of this. Wow. Isn't it amazing? Hey, guys. I think we should also fight against Transfection.
01:44:38:40 - 01:45:27:52
Speaker 1
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no no, no, no. This is about the origin. We're trying to figure out where the virus came from. We're not going to talk about Transfection. We don't have anything to say about that. Really? Yeah. So much so that you're out. That's the story of drastic in a nutshell for me. And so the the lab leak narrative was seeded by the intellectual Darkweb by an actual interview with Yuri Dig, the guy who was one of the few people who was given the gift of the fear and cleavage site in 2020 in the Furin cleavage site doesn't mean squat anymore, but it was so important for more than two
01:45:27:52 - 01:46:03:20
Speaker 1
years, ladies and gentlemen, they argued about that being a key evidence point. And Bret Weinstein, curiously enough, was one of the few people on YouTube that has a he has an interview with Uri Dagan. And I don't think it's off YouTube. I don't think it's down because he was part of seeding the worst case scenario narrative and making sure that the worst case scenario narrative was never discredited, never discounted, never doubted.
01:46:03:25 - 01:46:05:11
Speaker 1
That's what happened to us. Ladies and gentlemen.
01:46:05:11 - 01:46:20:56
Speaker 4
Team to fight some historic battle against a terrible evil. All of those people are now at least somewhat awake. They've now been picked on by the same enemy. And yeah, all right, we're outgunned. It has a tremendous amount of power, But but we've got all of the people who know how to think. So I hate to say it or maybe I like to say it, but I don't think it's a slam dunk.
01:46:20:56 - 01:46:27:28
Speaker 4
But I like our odds. I've never met a more foolish biologist. But what's that amazing conversation lesson? Thank you for that. What did he.
01:46:27:28 - 01:46:28:23
Speaker 1
Say?
01:46:28:28 - 01:46:32:08
Speaker 4
I've never met him. Were full of biologists. But what's that amazing conversation?
01:46:32:13 - 01:46:39:12
Speaker 1
I've never met a more fluent biologist. Did he really just say that? Is that really what he said?
01:46:39:12 - 01:46:53:04
Speaker 4
Our. But. But we've got all of the people who know how to think. So I hate to say it, or maybe I like to say it, but I don't think it's a slam dunk. But I like our talks. I've never met a more fully biologist, but what's that amazing conversation? Plus, we thank you for that. Thank you. Actually.
01:46:53:16 - 01:47:02:13
Speaker 1
Bless you. Thank you for that. my gosh. Can I vomit a more fluid biologist if that wasn't the most.
01:47:02:13 - 01:47:04:25
Speaker 3
Forced.
01:47:04:30 - 01:47:37:04
Speaker 1
If that wasn't the most forced and comment and and laughter I've ever seen, I don't know what is a more fluent biologist? What does that even mean? I it's funny because someone else tweeted a tweet, promoted that video and said that he is a master teacher. And I think Meryl Nass actually also retweeted that video and said that it's just extraordinary.
01:47:37:04 - 01:48:23:31
Speaker 1
And she's never heard a better explanation of the situation than that one. Don't you see how it all works? Don't you see how this all works? Meryl Nass has never seen has never seen a better interview than Bret Weinstein's interview. Meryl, NASA's Meryl, NASA's most important substack she's ever written was one that defended Robert Malone's honor. Brett Weinstein and Jessica Rose and Meryl Nass met met Denny Rancor and saw his presentation in Romania.
01:48:23:36 - 01:48:53:13
Speaker 1
They are completely and totally aware that he has evidence to show that the excess mortality from the shot is in old people and it's awful for them. He's got evidence that there is no spread in any of these geographic locations. The shots have raised all cause mortality. That's the third conclusion. And the only one that they ever push is the third conclusion.
01:48:53:18 - 01:49:23:42
Speaker 1
Robert Malone, Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch did their famous podcast, June, right after Byron Brittle threw away his career in Canada to reveal the Japanese document which showed the Olympic goes everywhere, that you don't want it to go. What is this Steven Hatfill doing in Romania? Steven Hatfill is like 70 years old. He should be a retired guy in a horse farm.
01:49:23:47 - 01:49:58:46
Speaker 1
And instead he's going to Romania to meet with the rest of these people. Did Andrew Tate pay for this? What is going on here? Why do all these Americans need to go to Romania, one of the most corrupt countries in the European Union? What is going on here and now? Why is it that when Bret Weinstein is on Tucker Carlson not questioning the fundamental narrative coming out as though he was a leader when he wasn't, he clearly didn't save anyone from the shot.
01:49:58:51 - 01:50:24:12
Speaker 1
It took him almost four years to say the word transfection out loud and then he still doesn't cop to the fact that he didn't use the word. He doesn't cop to the fact that he gave the shot more credit. Not we. He whenever he was making excuses in that interview, whenever he was saying that we fell short, he was saying we not he I don't say it that way.
01:50:24:12 - 01:50:57:54
Speaker 1
I the mistake I got sucked in, but very specifically, I got sucked in by people like him, people like him doubting me on signal chats and the other people in that signal doubting me or not backing me up. When I had the day that I had the biology nailed, who was in that signal chart? Not just me, not just Brett and Heather.
01:50:57:59 - 01:51:29:42
Speaker 1
And all of those people are meddlers. Now, all of those people were meddlers then because they were all part of team. Worst case scenario to make sure that people like me who were saying that whatever this RNA signal is, it ain't worth taking the transfection for to make sure that people like me did not rise in prominence, that people like me were not listened to, and that the views as much as much of the useful information, the real dead on balls, the accurate biology that I had would be co-opted by people like Bret Weinstein.
01:51:29:47 - 01:51:51:52
Speaker 1
And what did they do to Danny Rand? Cor they co-opted the only useful biology had, which is that the shots are bad. That was already a conclusion that they wanted to go with. Now they're going to go and blame it on the spike protein again, probably. But they're not saying there is no evidence for spread. They're not saying that there was no justification for the rollout of these shots.
01:51:51:57 - 01:52:14:48
Speaker 1
That would be a completely different message. And Even if Danny wants to send it, they're never going to amplify it. And because they all had breakfast together and spend time in a foreign country, they are never going to fight again in public and they're never going to complain about each other's selective amplification of the ideas of Danny Rand Corps.
01:52:14:52 - 01:52:34:53
Speaker 1
But Danny Rand Corps is fine to complain that Robert F Kennedy doesn't promote his ideas. The Robert F Kennedy book is missing the fact that there's no evidence of spread. But he doesn't have any problem with Bret Weinstein not saying it on Tucker Carlson. He didn't have any problem with Bret Weinstein not saying it on Tucker Carlson. That's okay.
01:52:34:53 - 01:53:15:29
Speaker 1
Bret Weinstein is doing his best. At least he said 17 million right. You got to see it for what it is. Ladies and gentlemen, we have been if you haven't seen the movie The Sting, that's what you really need to see. The movie, The Sting is probably the best movie to illustrate what happened. If you get enough people together, enough talented people together, you can pull off a heist the world's never imagined possible.
01:53:15:34 - 01:53:45:31
Speaker 1
A heist where the entire globe is hoodwinked into believing that there was a novel virus that killed millions of people, that millions more was saved from. That was like the gain of function, and it will probably come again. And they're going to keep doubling down and pretending that they were ahead and that they're just the default leaders because they're the ones that are the fluent biologists and they're going to get our kids on this train.
01:53:45:36 - 01:54:10:50
Speaker 1
They're responsible for. Our kids being on this train. Brett is responsible for our kids and our college kids still being on this train where we have defeated disease in the past with the very elegant technology, called vaccination. The novel coronavirus is can jump species and they can pandemic. And that that bushmeat is a problem. The PCR works pretty well.
01:54:10:50 - 01:54:31:06
Speaker 1
Is it tested? Asymptomatic spread is real. These are all things that Brett didn't bring into question at all in that video, even though they are definitely in question. Variants are evidence of spread in the evolution of a single virus. There's no questioning that in Brett's. Any of Brett's movements. And we spend money on gain of function research and it's very dangerous.
01:54:31:06 - 01:54:56:19
Speaker 1
It's definitely something that Brett believes in how our college kids, our children, our high school kids, everybody that watches Brett Weinstein in the intellectual dark web people and YouTube and Rogan and all of them, they're all on this train. All of them are on this train right now. And we have about a year or a year and a half to get them off before they will be on it forever.
01:54:56:24 - 01:55:24:05
Speaker 1
That's what you need to see. This new world order still has the possibility of being broken. This cartoon can still be made fun of, but it won't be forever. My kids teachers are already broken. The erasure is about to be forgotten and the lie will become the truth. So of course we know we've gone over it, how it's created.
01:55:24:05 - 01:55:47:40
Speaker 1
I really do think that three and four, especially for the seeding of the narrative, a worst case scenario team of people with security clearance or at least read in enough so they know they have to keep their mouth shut. These people were vital and they looked around on the internet for people like me, and then they streamed with them to make sure that they could try and influence them.
01:55:47:40 - 01:56:16:43
Speaker 1
They made friends with them. They showed up at their house and lots of them have been to Pittsburgh. Ladies and gentlemen, let's see, one, two. no. Sorry. One, two, three, four. And then many in Boston, a few in Knoxville. I mean, it's just extraordinary how many of these people I've met in person. And only because of me.
01:56:16:48 - 01:56:42:18
Speaker 1
There are a couple of people who went to the inaugural conference in Knoxville just because they found out I was going and at least four of these people had come to Pittsburgh to visit my house. And I've not led them to my house, but they've been to my my town and we've met. This is not a game. This is real.
01:56:42:23 - 01:57:14:30
Speaker 1
And it was for all the marbles. It's still for all the marbles. It's still for all the marbles. But we got to advocate for a pause on all childhood vaccines. You got to advocate for strict liability on all pharmaceutical products. We've got to investigate the mass casualty events that were misconstrued as spread. We've got to investigate the possibility that transfection or aerosolized toxins were used to see the idea of a pandemic much in the same way that Mad Dog Giordano describes in the video that I always played the beginning of this dream.
01:57:14:34 - 01:57:26:24
Speaker 1
We need to reclaim sovereignty over our bodies and those of our children, and we need to urge Congress to remove those from the the WHO and the U.N. entirely and to disrupt or rather dismantle the C, the CDC.
01:57:26:29 - 01:57:44:03
Speaker 3
But what I want is high morbidity. I want people to complain. So what do I do? I go to Des Moines, ladies and gentlemen, to people on the screen. I have nothing against Des Moines. I live there for four years. I go to Des Moines. I infect a couple of sentinel cases in Des Moines. I go to Seattle, I infect a couple of cases there.
01:57:44:07 - 01:58:10:28
Speaker 3
I go to North Carolina, I go to Wisconsin. What I'm doing is I'm using a dispersion methodology to be able to infect sentinel cases with a highly morbid condition. These individuals complain again. This is a central nervous condition, so they're complaining of whatever the bug may do. It'll produce some cascade of neurological and neuropsychiatric signs and symptoms. And then what I do, real bugs that I use is the Internet.
01:58:10:30 - 01:58:29:52
Speaker 3
He speaks this fake attribution for that. Yes, I'm a terrorist group and I have done this by infecting with a highly digital agent and the first signs and symptoms of lethality are X, Y, and Z. These people are really sick with this. But then I see others who are also infected will show some drama, freedom, signs of lethality.
01:58:30:00 - 01:58:58:54
Speaker 3
And what that will be is anxiety, sleeplessness, agitation. What I've now done is I've got every individual who is diagnostically hypochondriacal and I've got every individual who's worried, well, flooding the public health system, banging on the door. The CDC comes back and says nonsense, that's not real. I come back and say that's fake news. And as a consequence of doing that, what I do is I create a schism between the police and the public health system.
01:58:58:58 - 01:59:06:07
Speaker 3
I fracture the integrity of trust, the reliance upon the population and its government.
01:59:06:12 - 01:59:35:31
Speaker 1
And so I want to be very clear here. I think these two things here are very important to COVID hospital protocols capable of increasing all cause mortality, but they are ignored and emergency social policies capable of increasing all cause mortality that are ignored. So you need people in place who are going to ignore those things. You need people in place that are going to freely, admit that the incorrect treatment of people with the respiratory disease, especially the non use of antibiotics, could really cause trouble.
01:59:35:36 - 02:00:15:47
Speaker 1
And the people that were going to talk about that were going to be able to use alternative medicines needed to be on narrative with regard to hydroxychloroquine and and ivermectin, so that even if ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were given in combination with antibiotics and steroids, both of which would know, would most likely helpful the narrative that these people were required to stick to in the narrative that the media stuck to was scrutinizing hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for effectiveness without ever admitting that they were being that they were being administered with these other things that were known to be withheld from the COVID protocols to begin with.
02:00:15:52 - 02:00:52:23
Speaker 1
So anyway, this is a list that I think also could be used to summarize what happened in how they seeded the pandemic idea and the Scooby-Doo itself, which is convincing the public a lab leak cover up is happening before their eyes and use island nations to demonstrate that lockdowns work. And very vocal and angry leaders of those nations to say that those people owed them their lives for them, making such a difficult choice to lock them down, even though they know that it's a very difficult thing to weigh, you know, your rights versus your your freedoms in this kind of thing.
02:00:52:28 - 02:01:32:03
Speaker 1
And the way that they this entire operation up was to debate everything very vigorously, to have very, very vocal, angry and energetic discussions about everything but the novel virus that was killing millions of people and the existence of gain of function, none of those things were questioned at all, and there were a few people that were questioning them, though it was very hard for people to connect with those.
02:01:32:07 - 02:01:54:21
Speaker 1
I will give credit where credit's due. I do think that the Baileys were questioning gain of function as a mythology, but the way that you the way that we could communicate with them was very limited and the way that that they communicated with other people was very limited. And I've shown you the email that I've sent to the Baileys.
02:01:54:21 - 02:02:19:15
Speaker 1
I always wanted to interview them. And and it just never really worked out. And then we had a lot of very high friction encounters. Once I started to become associated with Bobby. And Eddie hired a lot high friction encounters with these no virus people. And it might have been because of my association with Bobby, and they really don't.
02:02:19:16 - 02:02:40:03
Speaker 1
And a lot of these same people think that that that Bobby is somehow, I don't know, controlled opposition as opposed to being a kid who was when he was 14, already attempted to be influenced by every adult in his life for the rest of his life, and left alone in his understanding of who is father and who is uncle.
02:02:40:03 - 02:03:09:33
Speaker 1
Were, and now an adult having been influenced by other adults since he was 14. I don't know. For me, it's very easy to be optimistic that Bobby is a kid who's been on a revenge mission since he was 14 years old, and he was smart enough to know all these adults were lying to him From then on. If he was eight when his dad died, I might think, okay, maybe these adults were able to bamboozle him.
02:03:09:37 - 02:03:43:19
Speaker 1
But they tried drugs, they tried murder, they tried everything, right? He if he if anyone is aware of how keeping your enemies close is actually a pretty good idea. And so if you're super optimistic about it, you know, it could be. Our last hope is Bobby Bobby Kennedy. I mean, it's possible that he's just waiting to get the keys to the White House and then he's going to say that the whole vaccine schedule needs to be torpedoed.
02:03:43:24 - 02:04:12:49
Speaker 1
And now he needs to be torpedoed and that academic science needs to be fundamentally reordered. Maybe he's going to do all of that once he gets the keys to the White House. If he gets the keys to the White House, I have a feeling that the people that are running this show will take drastic measures if things don't go the way that they planned them to go, whatever that plan is.
02:04:12:54 - 02:04:50:28
Speaker 1
And so as optimistic as I am, I also know that we are up against what Brett Weinstein called Goliath. I'm sure it's much more than Goliath. It's it's four or five weaponized piles of money, if not ten. And they may all sit down and talk very nicely to each other across the big table. But in private they are all competing for all the marbles and the foundation of the illusion for which they are competing to control us all is this illusion of consensus about a dangerous novel virus that's been going around the world for going on five years.
02:04:50:33 - 02:05:16:46
Speaker 1
It's killed 7 million. And it's this faith in a novel virus that we don't want our kids to be trapped in. We need them to understand that it's a lie. And there was likely there is likely a background signal that was never characterized. It's just been misconstrued as spread. Everything else is smoke and mirrors. They have lots of tricks that they could have pulled in order to make sure that the molecular biology lined up wherever it needed to line up.
02:05:16:51 - 02:05:45:58
Speaker 1
And it seems to become more and more obvious every day that there seems to be a real effort to absolutely destroy the fundamental fabric of the American culture and the culture of the West through dilution and and migration through and destruction of infrastructure and just destruction of the the very foundation of the culture making us question who we are as a society by fracturing us in such a way that we can't even talk to our neighbors anymore?
02:05:46:03 - 02:06:14:30
Speaker 1
This is a real a real open wound that exists that no one has bothered to put any pressure on yet. But the moment they decide to put pressure on it, everybody in America is going to feel the pain. And I'm very, very pessimistic about how they're going to do it, but it's most likely going to have something to do with the election or soon after.
02:06:14:34 - 02:06:36:09
Speaker 1
But they did it for all of these things. They did it to avoid this exponential increase in Medicare costs that they knew that was coming because Medicare is not an option in the congressional budget. It's a real must pay number to protect against. The growing skepticism in vaccines is also another reason why it had to happen when it happened to transition to digital currencies.
02:06:36:09 - 02:07:09:11
Speaker 1
Absolutely. To transition to genetic vaccines? Absolutely. To confound the toxicity of an imaginary or planted RNA signal with transfection to allow the pandemic to prove trans sex transfection successful? Absolutely. The trans the transition, the youth into submission and full digital control. Absolutely. To edify the mythology of pandemic viruses. Absolutely. To disrupt family formation. Absolutely. The dating is not what it used to be.
02:07:09:16 - 02:07:34:48
Speaker 1
Going out to the bars and what it used be. Meeting strangers isn't what it used to be. And that's disrupting family formation. It's it's shortening the lifespan of billions of people to avoid this ever increasing cost to keep old people alive. Absolutely. To kill a billion people with a gain of function virus? I don't think so to destroy the cultural fabric of America.
02:07:34:48 - 02:07:59:04
Speaker 1
The rest. Yes. And to help create the chaos necessary for a fundamental reorganization of how the world is governed. I think absolutely. And so there are players, there are people who've signed down, wittingly or unwittingly, to be a part of this governing structure. Maybe the words weren't used that way, but they knew they were signing on to something that wasn't completely kosher.
02:07:59:09 - 02:08:29:09
Speaker 1
It was based on exaggeration. It was based on assumptions that aren't totally true. But they did it for comfort, for fame, to be part of the ruling elite. And it's this idea that this pandemic potential is accessible in the laboratory that produces this worst case scenario, that allows them to talk about gain and function mythology to try and change your kids minds.
02:08:29:09 - 02:09:07:03
Speaker 1
It's these books that have been written, the stories that have been told that are going to enslave our children. And I blame these people who were involved in seeding the worst case scenario, involved in making us right, making it really hard for the critical mass to form in 2020, never mind in 2020 21, never mind in 2020. They made it almost impossible for the critical mass to realize they made it impossible for the critical to realize that this was just a transfection.
02:09:07:08 - 02:09:41:53
Speaker 1
They made it impossible for the critical masses to realize that maybe this was just an endemic background virus all along and I had that idea for so long. Ladies and gentlemen, so long people have been trying to distort that into something more complicated than just they didn't know what was in the background. They characterized the background. And then using that characterization, they really rolled out the background as evidence of spread.
02:09:41:58 - 02:10:07:07
Speaker 1
And all of these people in the car with me have been ignoring all of these insights, all of these great ideas, all of these more parsimonious explanations for what's going on. They've all been ignoring it and they've all been insisting we should argue about this. When I got in the car with drastic, that's what they did to me when I got in the car with Bret Weinstein and the rest of the people in that signal chat, that's what they did to me.
02:10:07:12 - 02:10:41:43
Speaker 1
In fact, every car I've gotten into, that's what they've done to me without exception. Think very carefully about what that means, because the illusion of consensus runs deep. It makes people very afraid to speak up because they don't want to go against the consensus. It's one great big, giant ass conformity experiment, and the faith in the novel virus is agreed on by so many people that people are afraid to question.
02:10:41:43 - 02:10:55:27
Speaker 1
And maybe that's why Bret doesn't open his mouth, But I think that's not the case. Stop lying. Got to get out of this car. Ladies and gentlemen.
02:10:55:31 - 02:11:12:09
Speaker 7
It doesn't matter much all what you believe about vaccines until we invent really important ones. You know this. We have not a mistake killing everyone. You know, this is not accidental. It's not. It's, you know, measles plus an elk I can tolerate, which is going to accidentally happen.
02:11:12:10 - 02:11:13:06
Speaker 1
He didn't accidentally.
02:11:13:06 - 02:11:13:41
Speaker 7
Say, look at.
02:11:13:42 - 02:11:15:59
Speaker 1
The gun aims a hardcastle.
02:11:15:59 - 02:11:16:50
Speaker 7
In the end.
02:11:16:55 - 02:11:19:48
Speaker 1
But on December one one.
02:11:19:53 - 02:11:22:44
Speaker 7
2000 pandemic that is you know, got.
02:11:22:44 - 02:11:23:53
Speaker 1
99%.
02:11:23:58 - 02:11:41:02
Speaker 7
Mortality and it it's not that there will be no pretense of being polite in the face of these beliefs. It'll be a moral emergency because it has to be. And This is just sheer contingency as to whether we're in one condition or another.
02:11:41:02 - 02:11:50:24
Speaker 1
It's intolerable. What he said. It's intolerable what they said. I missed podcasts that that.
02:11:50:29 - 02:11:51:57
Speaker 3
Hey, folks, welcome to.
02:11:52:10 - 02:12:22:48
Speaker 1
That. Herd immunity was something they were demonstrating that no masks are needed for them because they're special, that they could end the pandemic if we just lock down harder or use these combination of repurposed drugs like an SSRI inhibitor with ivermectin, 60 days definitely in need of new things. COVID zero COVID is possible. In this video, Brett is still advocating for the idea that if we just did things right, if we could force everybody to take drugs, if we could force vaccinate everybody, this would be over.
02:12:22:53 - 02:12:29:28
Speaker 1
Or if we just distributed ivermectin and taught the secret mason secret of how to use it.
02:12:29:33 - 02:12:32:51
Speaker 4
Is of the utmost importance.
02:12:32:56 - 02:12:35:42
Speaker 1
A year and a half after breaking ladies. And gentlemen.
02:12:35:42 - 02:12:39:34
Speaker 4
So a final.
02:12:39:39 - 02:13:01:46
Speaker 1
Spread of scarier ideas, much more terrifying than the spread of any RNA virus. I am sure of that now. I've never been more sure of it in my life, and I want more than anything to make sure that other people understand this because it's really, really the case. It's really true. It's real life. This is the this is the way that we end it.
02:13:01:46 - 02:13:24:16
Speaker 1
We end it right now. We can end it right now if we want to. And unlike Brett was describing it, we can end it by telling the truth. We really can. And I think the way to do it is, to see the meddlers for who they are and if we see the meddlers for who they are, then everything will be fine.
02:13:24:16 - 02:13:53:38
Speaker 1
They will never advocate against all childhood vaccination in America, will never advocate for the specific evidence that the Americans schedule in its abundance and its timing can be compared with any other vaccination schedule in the Western world and can be seen on its face as criminal. None of these people are ever going to say that they do not advocate for strict liability for all pharmaceutical products.
02:13:53:38 - 02:14:11:22
Speaker 1
They're going to talk about fighting the WHO, but they're never going to talk about fighting the Prep Act or the 1986 Vaccine Act. Brett will never say that. Brett will say the who is what we got to be afraid of. Brett will never say get rid of the CDC. He's talking about the who Meryl Nass is starting a.
02:14:11:22 - 02:14:12:27
Speaker 3
New.
02:14:12:32 - 02:14:55:10
Speaker 1
Meryl Nass is starting a new nonprofit. It's supposed to fight the who. What can't Meryl Nass do under the banner of PhD that she can do under the banner of her own nonprofit? What a weird what a weird thing, right? You know, somebody been working as a scientific as a primary consultant to Ph.D., As far as I understand it, before the pandemic, she was face of of of of I mean like the adviser as far as I understood.
02:14:55:15 - 02:15:36:27
Speaker 1
And so if she's the one of these big advisors of the Ph.D., it seems to me if she thinks that the priority should be fighting the WHO that you could probably she could probably do that under these banner. She probably doesn't like the Who either, as far as I can guess. So it's strange that she thinks that she's got to start a new nonprofit to fight the Who and doesn't want to fight the vaccine schedule in America, doesn't want to fight the Prep Act, does want to get rid of the Vaccine Act from 1986, but wants to fight the WHO in the WHO treaty.
02:15:36:32 - 02:16:07:37
Speaker 1
Make everybody aware of the WHO treaty. Is it a treaty or an executive agreement? Does it really count as something that's part of the Constitution? That also seems to be a little gray. They seem to be really happy to have us jump to the conclusion that if the WHO pandemic treaty passes, that the U.S. government and all these other governments that have signed on are just as so well, That seems to be a pretty important message that Brett and Meryl agree on.
02:16:07:42 - 02:16:39:18
Speaker 1
Don't forget, they had breakfast in Romania. They are unable to use the word transfection effectively up until very, very, very, very, very recently. And I've only heard Brett use it I haven't heard Danny Denny Rancor, call them Transfection. So he actually says the vaccines have killed people. I haven't heard Meryl Nass ever call them Transfection, although, you know, maybe it's just easier to call them all vaccines.
02:16:39:23 - 02:17:12:36
Speaker 1
I haven't heard Steven Hatfill call them Transfection, although I'm sure he's been in the field way long enough to know that they are transfection, just like Robert Malone has been in the field way long enough, know that their transactions, but it's never really called them that. So I think that's where we're that's where we should be here. We should be looking at and listening to them very carefully, looking at the historical record, what they said, and realize that these truths were known to them from the beginning, but they chose not to reveal them.
02:17:12:41 - 02:17:45:19
Speaker 1
There were doors to freedom that could have been opened, that weren't opened, and now they're being opened as if as if these people were always fighting to get them open. But they weren't. They were acting as if they didn't exist. They were acting as if they've always been fighting against these things when they haven't. That's really where this extraordinary thing comes to light, because they attack people instead of ideas.
02:17:45:19 - 02:18:10:57
Speaker 1
They complain about division and they can't summarize across entire show. And even though all these various people are saying that Brett Weinstein has just summarized it better than anyone, I think I've made it very clear in the last two shows that he didn't summarize Jack. What he did was obfuscate the truth. What he did was protect the faith of the novel virus.
02:18:10:57 - 02:18:46:46
Speaker 1
What he did was reinforce the narrative of the state, whatever that is, of these weaponized piles of money that are trying to usurp and control demolished. We call the West, and specifically America. As Brett said, the West is pretty much destroyed. It's gone. It's dissolved, it's fallen apart, it's collapsed. And what we have remaining is an echo of the West.
02:18:46:51 - 02:19:11:06
Speaker 1
I think a lot of those people in that group photo and Romania would probably agree and be happy to say in any podcast they got invited to. Ladies and gentlemen, we are at a time point where human diversity is at a peak for all time, and that's why they're very interested in getting our grandchildren on board with the idea that all their data should be community.
02:19:11:11 - 02:19:59:04
Speaker 1
You should do your part, you should give in your data, you should surrender to the digital system because it's convenient, but also very, very, very safe. Ladies and gentlemen, stop all transactions and humans because they are trying to eliminate the control group by any means. They're trying to eliminate the dissidents by any means necessary. And that's going to include absorbing all the good ideas, absorbing of the ideas they possibly can, and claim them for their own so that they can put their own spokespeople in front and continue to pretend to be, you know, really opposing things when in reality they are absolutely, positively sculpting the limited spectrum debate which will enslave our children forever.
02:19:59:09 - 02:20:29:55
Speaker 1
I have no doubt in my mind that this is what's going on. And that's why we need to make sure that our teenagers grow up understanding that intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb. We need our teenagers to grow up understanding that transfection into healthy humans is criminally negligent because thousands, if not millions of adults knew better from their professional experience as biologists that transfection was an inappropriate therapeutic for anything.
02:20:30:00 - 02:21:05:13
Speaker 1
And finally, viruses are not pattern integrity. That's something that all biologists need to and learn because almost all of us were clueless about this before the pandemic, and that's why we got sucked into it. That's how I got sucked into it. And people playing, you know, means like Bimbo Bailey kept me from connecting with those people, people that were really just trying to see worst case scenario and make sure nobody figured it out.
02:21:05:13 - 02:21:35:44
Speaker 1
That's that's why we're here. And we need to find these people, identify These people, because that's how we're going to win by discrediting them and getting everyone to see them for the meddlers that they are. It's t worst case scenario. See you guys again soon. These are the supporters of google biological. Thank them all very very much for the production of this show and for my time, especially for Greg and his support.
02:21:35:49 - 02:21:58:09
Speaker 1
But yeah, it's a lot of people and I can use all the subscribers I can get because I think if we reach a certain threshold, this is just never going to stop and it's going to instead be evolve into maybe one of the best scientific or biological news programs on the Internet and you would be a part of of making that possible.
02:21:58:13 - 02:22:20:54
Speaker 1
There's never to be any corporate sponsorship here. It's just going to be families fighting for other families. And I'm very proud to say that I'm I'm I'm really that's the plan. It's families fighting for other families. And so if you like what I'm doing and you have the means, please, please share my work if you like I'm doing and you have the means, please support my work.
02:22:20:54 - 02:22:32:26
Speaker 1
Thank you very much. You can find me a gig on biological dot com and I'll see you again tomorrow.